Questions tagged [wittgenstein]

Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein (1889 – 1951) was an Austrian-British philosopher, professor in philosophy at the University of Cambridge (1939-1947). He worked in foundations of mathematics and on mathematical logic, the philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of language. He played a central, if controversial, role in 20th-century analytic philosophy.

Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein (1889–1951) was an Austrian-British philosopher, professor in philosophy at the University of Cambridge (1939-1947). His work, technically separated into three periods but generally divided into the 'early' and the 'later' Wittgenstein, was primarily focused on the philosophy of mathematics and the philosophy of language.

Originally a student of engineering, Wittgenstein always had a keen interest in mathematics and was keen on the idea of designing and flying aeroplanes. After receiving a diploma in engineering he encountered the works of Bertrand Russell and Gottlob Frege on the foundations of mathematics and became deeply intrigued in formal logic, visiting Frege who in turn recommended he go to Cambridge to study under Russell. Wittgenstein would become Russell's fiercest pupil, seeking to challenge the logician at every opportunity.

Initially a collaborator in the logical atomist movement pioneered by Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell, Wittgenstein's concern for the limitations of language led him to became one of the movement's critics, before Gödel formally proved the futility of the logical atomist project. Wittgenstein's first work, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, explores the limitations of the logical atomist project and of philosophy itself, though rooting his thesis in formal logic and the propositional approach to philosophy and knowledge. One of the most significant ideas in the Tractatus is the distinction between what can be said and what can be shown, an idea that is surely rooted in his conception of mathematics as a language with only a syntax and no semantics or factual reference, and thus as a language which can be grasped through its syntax alone and can only generate rules. Ironically, the Tractatus was somewhat misunderstood by the logical positivists of the Vienna Circle, who basically sought to weaponise its concluding statement:

7. Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.

against metaphysics, in a bid to silence the obscure, unscientific and often verbose continental philosophers with whom their movement took issue.

Frustrated with the lack of understanding he received from his contemporaries and the futility of even his own work, Wittgenstein focused on lecturing and his ideas about the foundations of mathematics would change dramatically. Technically this would be his 'middle' period but because he essentially instructed, and concerned himself with, the foundations of mathematics during this period, and because many of his philosophical views would later be compiled in his Philosophical Investigations after his death, this period tends to be overlooked by philosophical academics. His middle period is best captured in a collection of his lectures on the foundations of mathematics, which are demonstrative of his shift from logical atomism and his lofty ambitions to complete Russell's Principia Mathematica to a sceptical finitism.

War played an odd role in Wittgenstein's life. During the first world war, Wittgenstein composed his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus and afterwards became the foremost philosopher of his time, while during the second he become very critical of philosophy and withdrew from academia, working as a nameless assistant in a hospital. Eventually he would return to philosophy, though he resigned from lecturing to focus on writing two texts that would come to influence a generation of analytic philosophers and would remain of significant interest up to the present day: the Philosophical Investigations and On Certainty.

These books represent the culmination of Wittgenstein's later period, and while the controversy surrounding the Tractatus was significant, it is this later work for which Wittgenstein is best remembered and in which he contributed some of his most significant insights. Though Wittgenstein was always a distinct character in philosophy, during this later period Wittgenstein is unique among his contemporaries in analytic philosophy for taking a somewhat more continental approach to philosophy.

In the Philosophical Investigations, Wittgenstein updates his original views about meaning from a static, pointing system of simple names and composites referring directly to facts, to a dynamic and mutating grammar that comprises life and situations as its metalanguage. He described these situations as forms of life or language-games that embody a rudimentary language that our actual language comes to represent through rule-following or a natural grasp of the abstract 'game' in a given form of life.

Wittgenstein not only resembled continental philosophy in his move away from formalisation, however. He was always cautious—or at least reticent—about the subject/object distinction, a central dogma of the Cartesian tradition that his contemporaries were all too ready to affirm. He avoided speaking about a distinct and foundational I or a cogito except for illustrative purposes. His emphasis fell rather on the facts themselves, the experience, the behaviour of people and the world in what he called 'forms of life' or 'language-games'. Even in his early work, which can be interpreted prima facie as a potential weapon against continental schools of thought, Wittgenstein rather described and visualised the experience, the nature of reality as pictures that are not absolutely distinct from the observer, the observer ever a part of the world and necessarily limited by its bounds.

For Wittgenstein, language was not simply descriptive, it embodied human experience and much of his later work can be said to be a phenomenological project. Seldom will you find a philosopher who is interested in the philosophy of mind/phenomenology who is not at least familiar with Wittgenstein's later ideas.

266 questions
19
votes
2 answers

Should Wittgenstein be given some credit for Godel's incompleteness theorem?

Is there a connection between Wittgenstein's argument against the "Theory of Types" and the proof of Godel's Incompleteness Theorem? Being only semi-knowledgeable, I will draw the connection of which I am thinking: it seems that Godel's proof…
17
votes
8 answers

Is "This sentence is written in English" nonsense?

Wittgenstein and many others have said that our language gives the appearance of truth to some nonsense. Do you think the very simple "This sentence is written in English." is such nonsense which seems true? It seems true, but if you translate it…
François
  • 330
  • 2
  • 9
17
votes
4 answers

What are some good books about Wittgenstein's philosophy of language?

I'm a computer science PhD student which does some work in Knowledge Representation, and I have studied a lot of (mathematical) logic. As far as I remember from my high school philosophy classes, Wittgenstein has some prominent works concerning…
loudandclear
  • 615
  • 1
  • 6
  • 10
16
votes
3 answers

What are some ways to read Wittgenstein's Tractatus other than resolute/irresolute?

There are, at present, two dominant ways to read Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (TLP). One is called the irresolute reading, the other the resolute reading. The irresolute reading takes what is called an inaustere view of nonsense:…
14
votes
2 answers

Is "propositions of logic are tautologies" (Wittgenstein) literal or mystical?

At 6.1 in the Tractatus, Wittgenstein says, "The propositions of logic are tautologies." When he says this, is he referring to the fact that the axioms of propositional logic as presented, for example, in the Principia Mathematica (published before…
sdleihssirhc
  • 263
  • 1
  • 6
14
votes
1 answer

Was Wittgenstein anticipating Gödel?

The Tractatus 6.123: 6.123 Clearly the laws of logic cannot in their turn be subject to laws of logic. (There is not, as Russell thought, a special law of contradiction for each 'type'; one law is enough, since it is not applied to itself.) This…
Alexander S King
  • 26,984
  • 5
  • 64
  • 187
13
votes
4 answers

Does Wittgenstein's Tractatus establish serious bounds for discussions of the supernatural from a modern point of view?

In today's mathematics, we have many variants of logic (propositional, first order, higher order, fuzzy logic, etc.). These are all self-consistent formal systems that are based on some set of axioms. In Wittgenstein's Tractatus, he demands a…
Nikolaj-K
  • 1,133
  • 5
  • 17
12
votes
3 answers

Why would Wittgenstein say we can't have a perfect language?

I have been reading Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations and my question is how does he come to realize that we can't have a perfect language. For instance I would say math is a perfect language because one can never mistaken 5 to mean 3 or…
11
votes
3 answers

On Wittgenstein's family resemblance and machine learning

Wittgenstein proposed in his later philosophy the concept of family resemblance to describe groups which cannot be defined by a single (or simple set) of common features but instead display (from the SEP): There is no reason to look, as we have…
Alexander S King
  • 26,984
  • 5
  • 64
  • 187
11
votes
4 answers

Are there any true Wittgensteinians?

[CRUCIAL CLARIFICATION: unless I explicitly say otherwise, all references to Wittgenstein, or W, below should be read as "the post-Tractatus Wittgenstein." I am not interested in those who could be described as followers of the author of the…
kjo
  • 568
  • 3
  • 12
11
votes
4 answers

If "the limits of my language are the limits of my world", then how can it be that "what can be shown, cannot be said"?

I'm trying to understand Wittgenstein, but two of his most oft quoted statements seem to me to be implying contradicting things. I understand that later Wittgenstein did refute a lot of his earlier ideas, but these statements both come from the…
Dylan
  • 148
  • 1
  • 1
  • 7
10
votes
5 answers

Why was Russell discontent with Wittgenstein's view on "logic as tautologies"?

While reading Logicomix, I came across a scene that I don't quite understand. Russell: ...Logicians are creating elaborate ways to "say the same things in different words"...this "everything is a tautology" stuff smells of metaphysical bosh! This…
10
votes
3 answers

What did Wittgenstein mean by saying that the belief in the causal nexus is a superstition?

In the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Wittenstein says: 5.1361 The events of the future cannot be inferred from those of the present. Superstition is the belief in the causal nexus. I'm not quite sure what is meant by "superstition" in this…
9
votes
3 answers

What does Wittgenstein mean by "grammatical jokes"?

In §111 of his Philosophical Investigation, Ludwig Wittgenstein writes (my hopefully not-too-inept translation1): Let’s ask ourselves: why do we perceive a grammatical joke as deep? (And that is what philosophical depth is.) I would have guessed…
kjo
  • 568
  • 3
  • 12
9
votes
2 answers

How does Russell's argument for identity refute that of Wittgenstein's?

In My Philosophical Development Russell wrote, I come next to what Wittgenstein had to say about identity, which has an importance that may not be obvious at once. To explain this theory, I must first say something about the definition of identity…
user13627
1
2 3
17 18