Questions tagged [continental-philosophy]

The term `continental philosophy` refers to the trends of philosophy prevalent in the European continent, particularly in 19th-20th century France and Germany. Philosophical ideas that fall beneath the title of continental philosophy include: German idealism, phenomenology, existentialism and deconstruction. Notable thinkers include Edmund Husserl, Franz Brentano, Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Jacques Derrida.

The term continental philosophy refers to the trends and concerns of 20th century and contemporary philosophy prevalent in the European continent, particularly in France and Germany. The term serves to differentiate ideas such as phenomenology, existentialism and deconstruction from ideas prevalent in Anglo-American philosophy such as logical atomism, logical positivism, scientism and pragmatism—which comprise analytic philosophy.

Continental philosophy was very much rooted in German idealism and grew out of the work of Immanuel Kant and G. W. F. Hegel, and out of critical reactions to these philosophers from the likes of Friedrich Nietzsche, Karl Marx and Søren Kierkegaard; following German idealism and its critics, phenomenology came as a culmination of the Cartesian tradition (the subject/object distinction; cogito ergo sum...) which inspired a radical, game-changing rejection of that tradition from Martin Heidegger, whose return to Greek philosophy and re-examination of the most fundamental question of Being inspired a new generation of philosophers wholly more aware of themselves and less eager to explain the world in some grandiose system, instead turning their gazes inward to try and comprehend the difficulties that come in simply existing.

In parallel to this learning experience and the absolute turning of the tables on Hegel's attempt to create an encyclopaedic solution to everything, a new found interest in linguistics and the role of language in philosophy emerged. Ferdinand de Saussure's A Course in General Linguistics attracted attention and the question of signifier and signified inspired many thinkers to apply the ideas to philosophy, psychology and the arts, particularly Jacques Derrida, Jacques Lacan and Michel Foucault. The end result, after structuralism fell out of favour, was deconstruction from Jacques Derrida. Deconstruction is difficult to define because deconstruction highlights the dynamic and transient nature of definitions, and has itself been misinterpreted and redefined as it was imported to various other areas of thought, from structuralist linguistics to philosophy, literary criticism and feminism.

Deconstruction is not dissimilar to Heidegger's destruktion in that it is not a tool or a method of doing something, but rather it is simply the reality that the dichotomies of philosophy are power dynamics that are beyond solution, that these binary oppositions (subject/object, man/woman, etc.) cannot simply be resolved as an equation. Both sides of the opposition are not going anywhere and form a master/slave relationship that shifts with the times. While Derrida's grammatology, the art of deconstructing, is a positive 'science', it nevertheless highlights the limits of philosophy and human epistemology as limits of human language and history. An idea common to all true continental philosophers is an awareness of the limitations of philosophy and a desire to step outside of those limitations, to expand the scope of thought beyond philosophy.

Though both continental philosophy and analytic philosophy deal with the philosophy of language, they approach the topic from very different angles; the former follows the structuralist and semiotic accounts of language use, while the latter looks at languages more scientifically and psychologically. That is not to say that the two branches do not arrive at similar conclusions however; thinkers from both sides arrived at the conclusion that meaning divides into signifier and signified, sense (sinn) and reference (bedeutung), for instance. Continental philosophy can be considered a qualitative approach to philosophy, whereas analytic philosophy emphasises quantitative methods and seeks to root everything in well-formed propositions that can be broken down into truth-values.

Continental philosophers have endured a great deal of criticism from Anglo-American philosophers for speaking in riddles and failing to make any clear or real points. Nevertheless, the continental flavours of philosophy are still very much alive in contemporary philosophy and have spread with much more interest into the domain of the popular press and creative media, inspiring art, films and literature. This is thanks to continental philosophy capturing, often very poetically, the feelings that have haunted recent generations in an increasingly open and nihilistic society in the developed world.

121 questions
23
votes
7 answers

Do some continental philosophers deliberately obfuscate their writing? Why?

In /r/philosophy a Redditor claims that certain continental philosophers deliberately write in a muddled (obscure, complicated) style; because they believe that to truly understand some ideas, a reader of philosophy should struggle with the text,…
Mirzhan Irkegulov
  • 946
  • 10
  • 29
22
votes
4 answers

Which philosophers have done most to bridge the analytic/continental divide?

I am interested to find out work done in this direction by prominent philosophers in each tradition. My paradigm cases would be Richard Rorty on the analytic side and Alain Badiou on the continental side. (That said, I know little about Badiou's…
19
votes
6 answers

What is the origin of the Continental vs. Analytic divide?

There's been much ado about the divisiveness between Heidegger and Husserl fans on the one side, with Frege and Russell stalwarts on the other. I'm mostly amused by accounts of name-calling between Derrida and Searle. With regards to the C/A divide…
15
votes
5 answers

Can philosophy overcome "the two cultures" divide?

Snow noted a growing divide between "the two cultures" in Western society, scientists and "literary intellectuals", who became increasingly self-absorbed and incomprehensible to each other. One of philosophy's traditional roles was providing a…
13
votes
7 answers

Are there any books about postmodernism being like sophism?

I still find myself relatively often surprised by how much of the spectrum of philosophic thought was already covered at the times of ancient Greece or ancient China (think Axial Age or think footnotes to Plato). Has any recent philosopher (or…
10
votes
1 answer

What are some good books on critical theory for analytic philosophers?

As far as I understand, there are two broad branches of critical theory: one is based on social theory, and the other on literary criticism and hermeneutics. I am more interested in the latter, of the kind that's been taught to a generation of…
9
votes
3 answers

"Continental" philosophers who have worked on the Philosophy of Mathematics?

Who are some philosophers that are generally placed in the continental tradition but who have done some work in the philosophy of mathematics. I know that Husserl has some great work in philosophy of math (but he isn't really firmly in the…
Dennis
  • 4,552
  • 1
  • 21
  • 38
9
votes
3 answers

What would be the difference between Fichte and Hegel?

I am quite confused how Fichte's ideas (and Schelling's ideas) and Hegel's ideas differ. There seem to be some common elements, but I am unsure how to pinpoint the difference between Hegel's and Fichte's.
9
votes
2 answers

Why should we listen to Michel Foucault if he based his arguments on biased historical claims?

I have only recently heard about philosophical ideas of Michel Foucault from a friend of mine. His claims, those concerning madness for example, sound iconoclastic to me. After looking up some relevant facts I found that a significant proportion of…
8
votes
6 answers

What are some good resources for Analytically trained philosophers to get into more "continental" figures?

My question is similar to this one and this one, but with a slightly different spin. I am interested in knowing who are some analytically trained philosophers who write on historically "continental" figures. I have in mind philosophers like Kris…
Dennis
  • 4,552
  • 1
  • 21
  • 38
8
votes
1 answer

Why did Heidegger (postmodernism) ignore Schelling's later thought?

F.W.J. Schelling (1775-1854) seems to be a seriously overlooked figure of modern philosophy: is there a good reason (beyond the merely historical) for his diminished relative importance compared, for instance, to Hegel? Heidegger admitted that…
8
votes
2 answers

Is there any philosophical significance to the arithmetization of infinity?

There are two arithmetics of infinity, ordinal & cardinal. I'm going to focus on the cardinal arithmetic as it requires less structure, that is they need less (i.e., ordinals require the idea of ordering whereas cardinals do not). Cardinal…
Mozibur Ullah
  • 1
  • 14
  • 88
  • 234
8
votes
2 answers

Are there plans to translate Heidegger's Black Notebooks into English?

I am curious to see the extent to which he made a home for national socialism in his thinking. If only Derrida could have lived to have seen these notebooks, how his estimation of Heidegger might (or might not) have changed!
Kyle
  • 363
  • 1
  • 9
8
votes
4 answers

Where does 'continental' philosophy fit in the subcategories of modern philosophy?

If one considers a abstract systematization of what constitutes modern philosophy, it is very natural to come up with something like wikipedia's outline: metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, logic, political philosophy, philosophy of mind, and many…
Mitch
  • 3,283
  • 1
  • 22
  • 30
7
votes
3 answers

What is the difference between Derrida's Deconstruction and Heidegger's Destruktion?

Derrida's deconstruction, as far as I understand it, is to critically examine values as embodied in binary situations like signifier and signified where there is an implicit hierarchy of value - one term is dominant, the other is submissive. These…
1
2 3
8 9