Questions tagged [principia-mathematica]
7 questions
6
votes
1 answer
What do logicists mean when they try to "reduce mathematics to logic"?
I've read a lot about Russell and other Logicism advocates and their trial to reduce math to logic. But what does that mean? We know that all known mathematics can be reduced to Set theory, is that their goal? If not, what was their goal precisely?…
Fawzy Hegab
- 450
- 1
- 3
- 11
5
votes
1 answer
What is the “intended project” in Appendix B of Principia Mathematica?
In Linsky's The Evolution of Principia Mathematica it is written,
Chapter 6 studies in detail the content of Appendix B, On induction. The
appendix consists of a technical proof that even without the axiom of reducibility, a limited form of the…
user13627
3
votes
2 answers
Why can Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem be proven?
Preliminaries:
The way I understand it, Gödel took Russel's and Whitehead's Principia Mathematica (PM) and mapped strings of symbols from PM onto the integers, their Gödel numbers.
He then constructed, within PM, a class of integers that correspond…
Johannes Bauer
- 135
- 4
2
votes
1 answer
Source of a Russell quote about difficulties in his work
Some years ago I read somewhere a memoir by Bertrand Russell. He wrote about the difficulties he encountered in writing Principia Mathematica (or trying to solve the paradox that bears his name). He wrote something like, "In the morning I sat down…
PierreVanStulov
- 123
- 3
2
votes
1 answer
Why is ZFC not as susceptible to Gödel's incompleteness as was the Principia Mathematica?
So, from what little I have read (such as this answer), it appears to be that one reason why the program of Logicism, as laid out in the Principia Mathematica, failed was that its goals (of finding a consistent and complete foundation of mathematics…
J.M.W Turner
- 269
- 1
- 5
2
votes
4 answers
In the construction of the Theory of Types, by what principle is "Socrates is a man is a man" judged nonsense?
While explaining why a function cannot take itself as an argument, I realize that the vicious-circle principle says nothing about why a function cannot take one of its values as argument.
The vicious-circle principle says F(Fŷ) is meaningless -…
George Chen
- 2,178
- 1
- 13
- 23
-1
votes
1 answer
Validity of physical laws and observation
I am placing this question on philosophy stack exchange because a mathematician wouldn't care, and a physicist would be extremely insulted.
Consider Newton's Law F=ma. First, I am observing this as a definition of force. from a philosophical…
user46399