0

All the definitions of consciousness I have come across seem to be circular. It is usually defined to be "experience", or "something that it is like to be". But that is circular. So, has anyone defined consciousness in a non-circular way? Or, is consciousness simply an undefined term? Perhaps there is simply no formal definition of consciousness.

user107952
  • 4,798
  • 21
  • 36
  • It's the thing you have to have to ask questions like this one. – Scott Rowe Dec 06 '22 at 14:25
  • 1
    Any definition of a mental thing requires mental language, just like any definition of a moral thing requires moral language and any definition of a physical thing requires physical language. – David Gudeman Dec 06 '22 at 15:17
  • @DavidGudeman Bootstrapping: it's not just a good idea, it's the law. – Scott Rowe Dec 06 '22 at 16:17
  • 1
    @user107952 "*definition of consciousness*" You don't define things. You define the words we use to refer to things. Consciousness is what it is. It does not need any definition. – Speakpigeon Dec 06 '22 at 16:44
  • In fact, there are few circular definitions of consciousness. [I've posted my own, which is purely circular, clarifying that it is barely based on another](https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/94639/is-conscious-thought-ever-necessary/94647#94647), which is not integrally circular. – RodolfoAP Dec 06 '22 at 16:51
  • @Speakpigeon, however, there is a thread in philosophy going back to Aristotle that does say you define things rather than words. I don't agree with it, but it's a respectable philosophical position. – David Gudeman Dec 07 '22 at 15:19

0 Answers0