1

I think the best of the best is not better than the others because he is better than them, but the best of the best is the one who makes others better than him and that is my philosophy and my goal in life be the best of the best.

And to do that you don't even need to have a great job in the workplace or be popular in any field or have lots of money, especially with the Internet which allows you to easily connect with others. and help them to be better than you in different areas to truly achieve your goal in this short life regardless of their background and country.

And share your philosophy in this terrible world where its noble values ​​are forgotten in favor of the quest for money and popularity and this sick philosophy of our time which says that everyone for himself, and nothing for the other.

And for you how can you be the best of the best without being a psychopath?

Mauro ALLEGRANZA
  • 35,764
  • 3
  • 35
  • 79
newuser10
  • 27
  • 2
  • I believe you are homing in on Emerson and Transcendentalism. And psychopaths aren't the best of the best; they are merely ruthless enough to destroy anyone who might challenge them. – Ted Wrigley May 08 '22 at 22:48
  • unfortunately this is the state of our world today, everyone tries to be better than others but forgets who really is the best of the best to become psychopaths who destroy others to be better than them... – newuser10 May 08 '22 at 22:55
  • 1
    One possible deep issue here is most people are objectifying their subjective meanings and thus causing conflict, an old [post](https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/81670/how-does-absurdism-deal-with-conflicting-notions-of-subjective-meaning/81677) in this site suggests Camus's Absurdism might be a modern philosophical cure... – Double Knot May 09 '22 at 02:05
  • I think we have to change this definition of the best in human society, which says that the best is better than the others, with a vision where the best is better because it makes others better than itself, that would be a good thing. and it can change mentalities little by little in the future, for a better future for the humanities with high moral value. – newuser10 May 10 '22 at 10:41
  • But the deeper intellectual problem here per your way is how do we define these apparently subjective words "best"/"better" to be accepted by all? Isn't everyone already pursuing the "best" future for themselves under their respective conditions? – Double Knot May 10 '22 at 17:02
  • With the above said, however, if you contemplate and meditate hard and long enough, the answer is not mystical or hopeless. Just staring at the word “fixing”, hopefully it can hint you with more relevant ideas… – Double Knot May 11 '22 at 17:02

0 Answers0