4

I feel like this question gets posed a lot in different ways and was curious if it might be possible to formulate it narrowly enough to get answered here.

For the most part I think the answer is determined by the question -- in other words, you find someone who does understand and get them to explain it to you.

Of course even with a pair -- or ideally a mentor -- one still must tackle a text in isolation. The "someone who understands" is finally the author themselves.

How to prepare yourself to evaluate and interpret a philosophical text? I'm looking for a strategic vision here.

Beyond tactical things like reading secondary sources or finding a pair/mentor to study with; and even beyond spiritual qualities (a certain patience, caution, charity, &c). Although ideally strategies for evaluation/interpretation will have an impact on the tactics and spirit of a reading.

What long-term sort of critical practices can help support the structured, rigorous reading and evaluation of philosophical texts?

Joseph Weissman
  • 9,432
  • 8
  • 47
  • 86

1 Answers1

1

I've found the best way to truly understand a work is to be a part of the ongoing discourse surrounding it -- i.e. try to find an opportunity to write about the work for an audience. Reading with the goal of communicating with others opens the opportunity for a much more rigorous approach.

This written dialectic is one of the fundamental activities of the philosophical community across history.