From the wiki on hyperreality,
The simulacrum is "an image without resemblance"; as Gilles Deleuze summarized, it is the forsaking of "moral existence in order to enter into aesthetic existence". However, Baudrillard argues that a simulacrum is not a copy of the real, but becomes—through sociocultural compression—truth in its own right.
There are four steps of hyperreal reproduction:
Basic reflection of reality, i.e. in immediate perception
Perversion of reality, i.e. in representation
Pretense of reality, where there is no model
Simulacrum, which "bears no relation to any reality whatsoever"
Clearly, the simulacrum would always bear relation to reality by it being able to be created from this process. The only way the above makes sense to me, is if the past history of the simulacrum is continously forgotten as it is created. Is this how Baudillard thought it, or am I missing something?


