9

I have a tankless water heater that is just a little bit to small for our new house - the temperature rise isn't quite enough for the winter months. Our basement is big and relatively warm so I struck on the idea of using a prewarmer, either in the form of a radiator (think automotive radiator, say off a F150 size truck) plumbed in before the water heater or a 100 feet of pex coiled in a 55 gallon drum filled with water.

How should I proceed?

Tim Brigham
  • 494
  • 1
  • 5
  • 15
  • 1
    To be clear, you're talking about using the ambient air temperature in the basement to heat the water? – Tester101 Feb 20 '15 at 13:49
  • @Tester101 that is correct. – Tim Brigham Feb 20 '15 at 14:19
  • 4
    At 2.5 gpm (maximum flow rate for shower heads), even 100' of 1" PEX would be emptied in just over a minute. Then you'd be out of prewarmed water. – Tester101 Feb 20 '15 at 15:34
  • 4
    You might want to look into a "*[drain water heat recovery unit (DWHR)](http://www.watercycles.ca/images/images/watercycle.gif)*". While it's not an option for everyone, it might be worth looking at. – Tester101 Feb 20 '15 at 17:52
  • Yeah, if you've got the space, just install a tank and forget about the tankless. For a normal constantly-occupied house a tankless is less efficient anyway -- they only save energy (vs a modern well-insulated tank) when use is fairly intermittent (eg, a weekend cabin). – Hot Licks Feb 20 '15 at 18:13
  • 2
    @HotLicks Do you have any data to back up that claim? – Tester101 Feb 20 '15 at 19:11
  • I don't have it at hand, but it's well known to be true, outside of the tankless salesman fraternity. I have seen several discussions of the numbers, notably on Breaktime. – Hot Licks Feb 20 '15 at 19:15
  • In warmer climates one could use a "Texas water heater" -- a black plastic tank on the roof. – Hot Licks Feb 20 '15 at 19:16
  • Another option if it's just for a shower is to slightly reduce the flow rate -- here in the UK you can get a flow-reducer that goes inline, otherwise you can slightly close any service valve present on the shower. The chances are any reduction won't have to be very much. – Chris H Feb 20 '15 at 19:52
  • @ChrisH that was my first thought.. I already have a flow reducer and a low usage shower head. Thanks for the input though. – Tim Brigham Feb 20 '15 at 20:23
  • @HotLicks thanks for your input, but I'm not scrapping my tankless. We saw a 40% reduction in our gas and water bills after installing it. It works well for our usage. – Tim Brigham Feb 20 '15 at 20:25
  • @TimBrigham - I don't see how it could reduce your water bill, other than by forcing folks to take shorter showers. – Hot Licks Feb 20 '15 at 21:17
  • @HotLicks it reduced the amount of water we needed for our washing machine (less hot water needed to reach the desired temperature for our clothes). – Tim Brigham Feb 20 '15 at 21:22
  • 1
    @TimBrigham - That makes no sense. The machine's going to run the same amount of water no matter what (aside from some of the screwy "high efficiency" units that can go bonkers if they aren't happy with the temperature). – Hot Licks Feb 20 '15 at 21:47
  • I suggest buying a [water heater](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_vessel) with an attached [tank](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Challenger_2#Crew_and_accommodation) from the [Brits](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWmDHO_0P5Q). – CodesInChaos Feb 21 '15 at 15:10
  • @TimBrigham It sounds like the heater is quite seriously underspecced. To work around this without replacing the heater isn't going to be easy. Waste heat recovery seems like your best bet as you need the heat morein the winter. I wouldn't advocate ripping out something newly installed but I would guess that most of the savings are not because of the type of heater but the much more efficient combustion in modern appliances. – Chris H Feb 21 '15 at 15:36
  • @HotLicks I have a high efficiency washer. :) – Tim Brigham Feb 21 '15 at 15:38
  • The HE washer will attempt to measure temps and run hot water until the desired temp is achieved, even if that results in overfilling the tub. If the incoming water temp is the same, it will use the same amount of water whether you have a tank or tankless. Only if you had turned down the temp on the tank in an attempt to "save energy" would there be a difference. – Hot Licks Feb 21 '15 at 18:32
  • @HotLicks Can you provide sources for your claim that tankless units are less efficient? Just looking at the energy factor of a high-performance tank vs a tankless, the tankless units perform comparably, and often still better. – Hari Apr 10 '18 at 22:54
  • If you haven't already solved this (it's a relatively old post, I know), then would you consider point-of-use units at the fixtures? They often plug into a standard NEMA 5-15 and provide up to 2.5 GPM (for a shower). – Hari Apr 10 '18 at 22:56

9 Answers9

10

The typical way to pre-warm water is to install a standard tank water heater before the tankless, but leave it turned off.

Using an automotive radiator is a terrible idea. You don't want to connect something not designed for potable water to your plumbing. That's just asking for trouble.

The pex idea is interesting. The only reason that I can think that this wouldn't work is that 100 feet of pex introduces quite a pressure loss. Put a meter on the end to make sure you have enough pressure going in to your water heater. If you have the stuff to do that, you can try it out. But I wouldn't buy 100 feet of pex just to do it.

Using a tank water heater has a couple of advantages over the pex-in-a-bucket-of-water idea:

  • If your tankless water heater has a problem, you can just turn on the tank water heater.
  • You get pre-warmed water for much longer with a tank than your 100 feet of pex.
    • With the pex solution, most of the heat transfer is going to occur when the water is sitting in the 100 foot coil. When the water is flowing, heat transfer from the bucket water to the water in the coil is going to be minimal. So once you empty the coil, your pre-warmed water is gone.
    • With the tank water heater, the room temperature water in the tank will mix with the incoming cold water. You get a very slow gradual drop in temperature, but it doesn't drop suddenly after a few minutes like the pex solution would.
  • If you ever have your water shut off, you've got a whole tank of water available for you to use.
longneck
  • 20,634
  • 4
  • 47
  • 78
  • 3
    The insulation on a standard water heater makes it somewhat less useful for the intended purpose than a plain, uninsulated tank. – Ecnerwal Feb 20 '15 at 15:18
  • That's true. I'll update my answer. – longneck Feb 20 '15 at 15:21
  • What if he installed a tank water heater _after_ the tankless one, and had it turned on? That way the tank water heater is getting filled with hot/warm water, and will use less energy to bring it up to the desired temperature. – Random832 Feb 20 '15 at 15:40
  • @Random832 that's a terrible idea. the whole point of a tankless system is to not heat the water until you need it. by putting a turned off tank first, you get the heat to pre-warm "for free" from the ambient air. if you put it after, you eliminate the efficiency of not keeping a huge tank of water hot continuously. – longneck Feb 20 '15 at 15:43
  • @longneck Nothing's free: The tank of water is going to cool his basement and make his house heating system work harder. And I thought the point of a tankless system was to never run out of hot water. – Random832 Feb 20 '15 at 15:45
  • the tiny amount of ambient heat the tank would draw from the air will not add additional stress to the heating system. and the problem here isn't "running out of hot water". the problem is temperature rise: the incoming water is too cold for the water heater to heat the water to the desired temperature. Tim is getting continuous hot water; it's just not hot enough. do you understand the concept of temperature rise in tankless water heaters? – longneck Feb 20 '15 at 15:52
  • If your water is shut off, how can you use the tank of water without any pressure? (Unless it's on the roof or something?) – Cameron Feb 20 '15 at 17:17
  • Use a bucket. I'm thinking water main break situation where most people would fill a tub or a sink with water. I've used my water heater tank in the past to flush toilets during a water outage. – longneck Feb 20 '15 at 17:20
  • Thanks longneck. Great insight. What about taking things the opposite direction - the potable water in the 55 gallon drum, non potable water in the pex attached to a radiator? A small electronic pump and it'd be pretty grand I think. – Tim Brigham Feb 20 '15 at 18:20
  • Again, you're exposing your potable water in your plumbing system to something not designed for potable water: the drum. Plus, your drum would have to be sealed pressurized or it wouldn't work. Go buy yourself a used water heater and be done with it. – longneck Feb 20 '15 at 18:22
  • Thanks again @longneck. I'm not sure what you mean about the drum not being designed for potable water. I'm referring to the blue polyethylene barrels that are food / water grade. – Tim Brigham Feb 20 '15 at 20:28
  • 1
    What about having a tank water heater before the tankless one, but set to a very low temperature? If the tank heater could be set for 30C (86F) and ambient was 20C (68F), idle energy consumption would be only 40% of what it would be at 45C (113F), and 25% of what it would be at 60C (140F). While the tank heater would have to spend energy heating colder incoming water to temperature, any energy it spent doing so would reduce the amount of energy the tanklessless heater would have to spend. – supercat Feb 21 '15 at 18:42
  • With a cold tank, would there be any risk of legionnaires disease? – StrongBad Sep 18 '17 at 21:56
  • @longneck is correct, the drum would need to be at house pressure, 60psi. There is no plastic drum that can take pressure like that. The tank heater is great; I'm going to do exactly this but make that tank electric and hook it up to some solar panels. Even if it doesn't perform that well, knocking 10 or 20 degrees off the heating will improve the energy efficiency of the inline. – SynaTree Jan 03 '22 at 02:30
8

You could add a smaller tank-less heater in front.

Some of them are even rated to be plugged into an outlet so you won't have to do additional electrical work.

In Europe I've seen it done with a bigger unit to supply the whole house and a smaller one at the shower for use during the winter.

In either case you're going to get a lot further with this solution as far as performance and you still get the energy benefits of a tank-less system.

Mr. Mascaro
  • 180
  • 3
  • 1
    Any other solution reverts it back to a 'tank' system or would cost near as much as a second one (100' 3\4 copper tube ~$500, +fins, ect) and not work as well as a 2nd unit. My family's summer home has two identical units, right next to each other. They were [expensive](http://www.rinnai.us/tankless-water-heater) but will cut back flow if the outgoing temp drops; HW forever, just not as much. Ideally you install a second unit, or a temperature actuated flow control valve (less ideal). Even better, a second unit that has it's own flow control. – Mazura Feb 21 '15 at 04:03
  • +1 Adding a second tankless unit is the most professional solution assuming the pipe is already well insulated. – stoj Feb 21 '15 at 05:45
  • I have added point of use tankless several times when the whole house unit did not meet the owners expectations.+ – Ed Beal Feb 19 '18 at 23:37
4

Do NOT use an automotive radiator - it's not meant for nor suitable for potable water use.

If you have a "relatively warm basement" you can either use a plain, uninsulated pressure tank (a "tempering" tank in this application - cold in the bottom, warmed out the top) or run a long run of large-ish diameter PEX (to minimize pressure drop) around the basement ceiling to collect heat. I see little advantage and several possible downsides (the primary one being potential rust-out or "plastic fatigue" depending on drum material) to "a coil of pipe in a 55 gallon drum of water"

Ecnerwal
  • 174,759
  • 9
  • 212
  • 440
  • If pressure drop is an issue why not run multiple lengths in parallel to increase both the flow rate (compared to a single thin pipe) and surface area (compared to any single pipe)? – Chris H Feb 20 '15 at 19:49
2

There are a few problems with your plan.

Thermal Conductivity

First off. If you're going to make a heat exchanger, you should use copper instead of PEX. Copper has a thermal conductivity of 401 watts/meter kelvin (W/mK), while PEX is closer to 0.51.

Volume

The next problem, is the volume of water you're preheating. 1" PEX has an inside diameter (I.D.) of just 0.865". Which means 100' of PEX, can only hold 3.0527478 gallons of water.

Volume = pi * r^2 * L
V = pi * 0.4325"^2 * 1200 in.
V = pi * 0.18705625 sq. in. * 1200 in.
V = pi * 224.4675 cu. in.
V = 705.18544896966691375461340363629 cu. in.

One cubic inch can hold 0.004329 gallons of water.

X = 705.18544896966691375461340363629 cu. in. * 0.004329
X = 3.0527478085896880696437214243415 gallons

In the US, shower heads are limited to a maximum of 2.5 gallon per minute flow rate. Which means if you're taking a shower, the preheated water will be used up in just over a minute. Even if you were to use 100 ' of 1" Type M copper tube, you'd only have 4.5411268397 gallons.

V = pi * 0.5275 in.^2 * 1200 in.
V = pi * 0.27825625 sq. in. * 1200 in.
V = pi * 333.9075 cu. in.
V = 1049.0013489785338857719650955024 cu. in.
X = 1049.0013489785338857719650955024 cu. in. * 0.004329
X = 4.5411268397280731915068368984299 gallons

That would almost give you a two minute shower. Though even with the higher thermal conductivity of copper, I doubt the incoming water would be able to pick up enough heat to make a difference.

Tank Storage

This is why using a 40 or 50 gallon holding tank is preferable. At 2.5 gallons per minute, you could take a 16 minute shower with just the water in the 40 gallon tank.

Insulation is your enemy

Modern hot water tanks are designed to retain heat, and are well insulated to do so. If you're using an off the shelf hot water tank as your holding tank, this insulation is going to work against you. You'll want to remove as much of the insulation as you can.

Contamination, Pressure, and disease

To prevent contamination into the water supply, you're going to want to install a check valve on the supply line feeding the holding tank. Because heating water increases its volume, you're going to have to install an expansion tank between the holding tank and the heater. Finally. Standing water is a breeding ground for bacteria, so you'll want to make sure you heat the water to at least 140°F (60°C).

Tester101
  • 130,386
  • 77
  • 314
  • 605
1

Did you insulate your pipes beyond the water heater so that they are not losing the heat rise per foot? The hotter they stay before appliance the less demand for rise on the heater. Make sure you tape all the seams.

Also do a tune on your heater -- often with both on boil and forced style heaters the efficiency and heat rise are below spec. I've seen claimed 95& with X to Y rise that were much lower out of the factory due to fuel quality, atmosphere/elevation, etc. Tuning them up you can get to about 98% and sneak out more heat rise.

A tank or radiator is not a good idea. Tank insulates itself preventing circ or convection and a radiator is delicate and will get clogged quickly. Pex is not a good idea either (since its not a good heat conductor). Instead get baseboard heating fins by the foot. You don't need the covers, just the fins. They are normally meant for copper pipe but you can slide whatever through them. You could cover your whole cold supply line going to the heater with the fins.

Another thought, if its not high efficiency vent, you can coil copper tube around the exhaust in order to leech some heat from the flue. Most on-demand heaters dont have the old (metal/single wall) exhaust style, but its worth a look. There is probably some massive warranty void while doing this though.

I guess another thought would be to leverage the bottom of things like the tub (or even the output hot line itself), assuming your supply is close enough (or touching), it could pre-heat the supply. Seems weird but in concept it could work -- preheating itself by heat that is normally leeched into the air.

dhaupin
  • 145
  • 1
  • 1
  • 9
  • Most the problems I have seen with tankless are electric with hole house units because of the power requirements. I have added electric point of use for a gas tankless but I have added more point of use to electric including reverting back to a tanked system for 1 home owner. – Ed Beal Feb 19 '18 at 23:45
0

Whatever sort of water heater you have, make sure to maintain its efficiency: If you have hard water, install a scale inhibition system (small water softener that resembles a filter), adding new pellets every 6 months and flush the system with vinegar or similar acid once a year. If it has a tank, replace the sacrificial anode every four years or so to prevent leaks.

  • Although the information is accurate to the life of a system it doesn't answer the question and should be entered as a comment. – Ed Beal Jan 09 '17 at 13:59
0

Tim I've been in the industry for 35 years and to answer your question directly. Undersized tankless heaters are very common. Even professionals don't know your personal habits and needs. To increase output you should definitely put a tempering tank before your tankless. If passive heat isn't sufficient then a small 120v electric water heater on a timer is a fantastic solution. I recommend setting the 120v at 94deg F. Just below the ideal breeding temp for legionella.

0

You can box in the electric water heater, and run dryer exhaust in there and then out the box. to the outside.

otherwise, if the dryer vent is not powered, a 12 volt CPU fan to circulate basement heat down there.

open up the water heater to remove insulation.. because you WANT ZERO insulation. You want heat from the room to radiate into the tank.

you will have 50+ gallons of water warmed up to 70+ degrees overnight... and only have to heat from there. Your tankless will have no problem.

If you dont have a tank, you could just have incoming cold water pipe coiled through a tub of water/ This serves two purposes.. warms up incoming water... acts as emergency water supply.

0

A tankless water heater should always be combined with a counterflow heat exchanger, especially all local tankless heaters. Can save 20 to 70% of energy, in theory next to 100%. Many instructions for DIY are available, e.g.

Heat Exchanger.

Easy to build, not expensive. But some local codes require to have at least 2 separating layers between fresh and drain water, which is not the case with those tube-in- tube solutions.

Another tube-in- tube solution would be to run a (coiled) copper tube inside an enlarged long siphon.

The tankless heater must be specified for higher input temperatures (> 25 degree Celsius), which is not always the case if the power electronic's cooling (triacs, IGBTs etc.) relies on cold input water.

The shower head resp. water nozzle should have reduced throughput. Closing 30 to 70% of the small holes with silicon (from inside) helps.

The comfort is normally nearly unchanged - and it saves water as well.

But the resulting higher dynamic pressure must not be raised over the maximal specified output pressure of the heater.

xeeka
  • 2,498
  • 1
  • 6
  • 9