31

I live in Germany and I always wondered why the radiators in most apartments are installed right beneath a window. The pictures below show an example (this is an older building, but you see similar installations in new buildings as well).

I would expect this to be the least reasonable place to install a radiator, due to the following points:

  • If you open the Window, well.. all the heat immediately flows away by convection
  • If you've heated up for some time, the walls will likely be storing some energy and perhaps the convection could be neglected for some time (if you keep the windows open for too long on a cold day, anyway no heating will help). But then the outer walls are probably the coldest in the building, which means that more energy is needed to heat them up in the first place -- also after closing the window.
  • Most of the central pipe systems are in the building center (I suspect this is the also the reason why many buildings have "closed" bathrooms, i.e. without windows). For radiators beneath windows, most pipes will need to be extended, resulting in more complex systems which are more expensive and will probably require additional maintenance.

Presuming my assumptions are correct, what is the reasons for installing radiators beneath a window? One argument I could think of is aesthetics. A radiator is probably not considered the most beautiful thing on earth by most people, so keeping it under the window sill may be simply a trade-off.

enter image description here enter image description here

isherwood
  • 119,766
  • 7
  • 148
  • 349
André
  • 311
  • 3
  • 3
  • 6
    FWIW, living in Chicago and the surrounding areas this has always been how my radiant heat has been situated as well. – Alexander Nied May 06 '22 at 15:14
  • 3
    "Presuming my assumptions are correct, what is the reasons" Are answers really supposed to pretend that you assumptions are correct and try to think of reasons within such constraints? This should be in worldbuilding.SE then. – Džuris May 07 '22 at 11:25
  • 4
    This question has been asked before on the Physics stack, you may find the answers there helpful as well: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/87731/why-are-radiators-always-placed-under-windows – Carmeister May 07 '22 at 12:34
  • 4
    This is pretty normal in much of the US. – Hot Licks May 07 '22 at 18:39

11 Answers11

50

In addition to the three good reasons from Ratchet Freak and Isherwood, I add that placing the radiator near the window is most efficient.

It heats the coldest air in the room and allows the air further from the window to settle to a similar temperature over time. If the radiator was away from the window, the air near the radiator would have to be heated to a higher temperature in order to create a gradient that heats the cold air near the window to a comfortable level. Occupants would generally raise the thermostat enough for that to occur. Occupants will not generally allow the air around the window to be uncomfortably cold in the name of reducing energy loss through the window.

jay613
  • 28,850
  • 2
  • 36
  • 112
  • 5
    And in addition to this: cold air from (large) windows drops down! Warm air from a radiator rises up and pushes against this down draught. See also the answer given by Ian Thompson, Morley, W. Yorkshire to [a similar question in the guardian online.](https://www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,5753,-2490,00.html) – Draakhond May 06 '22 at 15:27
  • 3
    I think the mechanism of convection and radiation by which this all occurs is fascinating but it's a big rabbit hole in the context of this answer. You heat the air where it's cold so that the room is comfortable everywhere and the temperature gradients and fluctuations are minimal. – jay613 May 07 '22 at 12:58
  • 1
    Most efficient in terms of what ? Energy usage? Space usage ? What is the goal to achieve? The heat losses through the window are zero when the window temperature or the air inside of it are the same as the outside air. So logically you lose more energy if you increase the temperature difference across the window. Hence heater near the window for the same power is less efficient than a heater away from it. There is something misleading in my opinion about arguing by human behaviour against simple physics. – Not a chance May 07 '22 at 19:00
  • @jay613: I was referring to the explanation that was given to me long ago, but I do think your version seems to be more universal. – Draakhond May 07 '22 at 19:24
  • 1
    @Notachance it's not a physics question. Human comfort and behavior is just as important to home improvement as physics and you fail if you ignore either. Imagining your house design to be in a high school physics test will not produce the desired efficiency when people who were not part of THAT question turn the thermostat up. – jay613 May 08 '22 at 14:24
38

Because other wall space tends to get filled with closets, art and random stuff. Below a window tends to remain free real estate.

Windows tend to stay closed during heating season so a window left isn't really a concern.

In general it is more uncomfortable to have a temperature gradient across a room than it is to have a cold room. Therefore it is better to apply heat where the heat is being lost the most which is the outside walls and windows and then let the rest keep stable.

ratchet freak
  • 10,047
  • 1
  • 20
  • 29
  • 3
    "Therefore it is better to apply heat where the heat is being lost the most" - but isn't that insane from an energetic perspective? – André May 05 '22 at 17:15
  • 5
    @André sure, but comfort is more important than being efficient. Though you might get an air curtain effect from the convection but I'm unsure how much that affects efficiency. – ratchet freak May 05 '22 at 17:20
  • 13
    @André : it might seem "insane" from an energy perspective, but you are going have the heat loss anyway, so installing under windows tends to compensate from the extra heat loss via a window(as others have said). Like ratchet freek said, it helps even things out and make it more comfortable. Here in the US, when baseboard heat was popular it was common practice to install them under windows. Even now, with ducted systems, it's common to install the duct registers under windows for the same reason. – George Anderson May 05 '22 at 17:31
  • 24
    I agree with the two reasons given in this answer and I disagree with OP's belief that this is "insane". The assumption is that with the radiator away from the window, the inhabitants will enjoy comfortable air away from the window, and permit the air near the window to be colder, thus decreasing energy loss through the window. The assumption is wrong. Inhabitants will turn the thermostat up so that the area around the window is comfortably warm, and the areas away from the window will be unnecessarily hot. Net energy use will *increase*. – jay613 May 05 '22 at 19:42
  • 4
    You want to try and warm the windows up. That's why radiators are placed under windows. If you are near a cold surface (like a window), even if the air is 72F, you will feel chilly because of the radiative cooling effect of the cold window on your body. – SteveSh May 05 '22 at 21:32
  • Climate info: https://weatherspark.com/s/71434/3/Average-Winter-Weather-in-Mecklenburg-Germany#Figures-ColorTemperature (where I live in Germany) – kpollock May 06 '22 at 10:49
  • @jay613 The depicted "radiators" appear to be optimized for convection, not radiation. They will heat the air near the window first. – user253751 May 06 '22 at 11:29
  • @user253751 yes the air near the windows, which is likely to be the coldest in the room, will be heated first. This will (hopefully) stabilize the room temperature and avoid causing people to turn the thermostat up in reaction to the cold near the window. It will also achieve all the other benefits described in the other answers. – jay613 May 06 '22 at 13:08
  • 1
    @SteveSh: I don't think "radiative cooling effect" is a thing. – TonyK May 06 '22 at 18:02
  • @TonyK - Yes it is. It's the way objects (such as spacecraft) shed their heat in space, where there is no air for conductive cooling. It's the way the sun warms our planet (except in that case it's radiative warming). – SteveSh May 06 '22 at 19:31
  • That's radiative heating. The spacecraft is radiating its heat away to its surroundings, as infrared radiation. It's not space radiating coldness into the object. This matters, because you always emit IR, regardless of whether you are next to a window or in space or in a freezer. – nomen May 06 '22 at 21:53
  • @SteveSh: That is passive radiative cooling. Your comment implied that there was such a thing as active radiative cooling -- that the window can cool you down by emitting "cold radiation". So no. – TonyK May 06 '22 at 22:03
  • @TonyK- I said nothing about active radiative cooling. You read something into my comment that wasn't there. To be accurate, all radiative cooling (or heating) can be considered passive, in that there is nothing (like a fan) forcing the movement of heat, in the form of IR radiation, from one place to another. And the radiative cooling effect I mentioned is nothing than the flow of heat, in the form of IR radiation, from your body to the cold surface of the window. – SteveSh May 06 '22 at 23:40
  • 1
    I disagree with a lot of reasons here, but this post is the best. It's about "free real estate." It's a myth that "warming up the windows" is the thing to do. Much of your heat escapes through the windows. Why would you place heat where you have the most leakage?? Really the most efficient is placing your heat source in the middle of the room. It passes through everything as it travels to the window. – rfportilla May 07 '22 at 03:43
19

In addition to what's been said, in extreme climates like Germany* and Minnesota, the window would completely frost over in January. Even modern low-e windows can't overcome -40°F, especially when indoor humidity is a bit elevated. Heat applied via radiator in that case or forced air in my case can help keep those lovely, desolate outdoor scenes visible.

* Apparently Germany isn't quite as cold as WWII documentaries led me to believe, but that doesn't change a thing about my answer. Frost can accumulate at any temperature substantially below freezing.

isherwood
  • 119,766
  • 7
  • 148
  • 349
  • 4
    And even in much milder climates, moisture can condense on the cold glass which blocks the view as well as creating mildew concerns. – Mark May 05 '22 at 21:29
  • 12
    Never in the history of recording temperatures have -40°F been measured in Germany. The all-time record is just shy of -35°F (-37°C, 1929). Average temperatures last winter were about 35°F (3°C). 14°F (-10°C) would be notable, -4°F (-20°C) exceptional. And if your window is frosting over in a halfway-modern(ized) building, you have been doing things *very* wrong. – DevSolar May 06 '22 at 06:54
  • 7
    @Mark: To the contrary. You *want* the moisture to condense on the window, because everywhere else, mildew concerns are *much* worse. – DevSolar May 06 '22 at 07:03
  • 4
    @DevSolar Sure, but windows don't exist in isolation. If the window is cold, the wall right next to it is probably almost as cold. If you keep the heating element under the window, you prevent mildew in the whole room, not just on the window - the window is the main area where heat is lost. – Luaan May 06 '22 at 08:29
  • 2
    @Luaan: Indeed, the window is only slightly colder. But that's sufficient. The humidity of the room will be capped by the condensation on the window - humidity there will hit 100%. The slightly warmer wall will have a local humidity of 99%, non-condensing. – MSalters May 06 '22 at 09:53
  • 2
    Germany was much colder in WW II than today. Not only because of climate change, but also because Germany lost its coldest 1/3rd to Russia and Poland. Some winters in WW II were very cold by local contemporary standards, and the worst fighting happened in the Soviet Union, not in Germany. So a winter in Cologne in 2022 has nothing to do with a winter in Königsberg in 1944. – gerrit May 06 '22 at 13:48
  • 1
    I used to live in Sweden, where -40 °C did occasionally happen, but never did the triple pane windows freeze over. It was actually very dry indoor, due to limited air exchange with the extremely dry outdoor. – gerrit May 06 '22 at 13:49
  • @Msalters - What you're really talking about is dew point and relative humidity. Anytime a surface's (window, wall, whatever) temperature drops to or below that of the dew point of the air, you will get condensation. And the dew point is a complicated function of the air temperature and the amount of moisture in the air. – SteveSh May 06 '22 at 14:07
16

Windows are almost always going to be less efficient than wall assemblies (even triple pane windows will be less efficient than wall assemblies built with energy efficiency in mind — triple glazed has an R value as high 11 for what I can find available while the recommended R values for exterior wall assemblies in cold climates are almost double that number).

By putting the source of heat next to the coldest thing in the room, you increase the evenness of heating and perceived comfort of the room. Since heating a room to the levels that we humans do is primarily about creating a comfortable space, this is an efficient way to create a comfortable space.

Have you considered a Heat Recovery Ventilator or Energy Recovery Ventilator as a more energy-efficient alternative to regularly ventilate a well-sealed home as opposed to opening the windows? Even Nordic countries with colder climates use mechanical ventilation with heat recovery for its energy efficiency benefits and consistent ventilation.

statueuphemism
  • 5,207
  • 11
  • 43
  • 63
  • Thanks for your answer. To your question: My feeling is that there would be less "waste" of energy if I want to ventilate the room. If I open the windows and this leads to an almost immediate drop of temperature at the radiator (where the thermostat is usually also located), it will start to heat at full steam. This would not happen (or at least much later) if the radiators were far off the windows. – André May 05 '22 at 17:14
  • 1
    @André Have you considered turning down the thermostat when you open the windows? – George Anderson May 05 '22 at 17:32
  • @GeorgeAnderson yes sure, that is an option :-) I was just wondering about the general issue. But admittedly, for most of the times I would forget/be too lazy to turn it off and on when I just want to ventilate all rooms for 5 minutes. – André May 05 '22 at 17:40
  • Most likely, @André, you're among a very small minority who want to ventilate a room in the winter when you're also heating. For those of you in that small minority, you're going to have to accept the heat loss, no matter what method of heating you use, nor where the heat source is in the room. – FreeMan May 05 '22 at 17:46
  • 1
    ...or use an HRV/ERV(heat exchanger for ventilating air) rather than a window to do the ventilating, with far less energy lost. – Ecnerwal May 05 '22 at 18:15
  • 3
    @André Modern electronic thermostat valves will typically detect a sudden rapid drop in temperature as an "open window" condition and _close or at least stay put_ instead of opening more. Older mechanical thermostat valves react way too slowly for 5 minutes of cold air to affect them much. – TooTea May 05 '22 at 22:07
  • Why would you open the window? Germans, IME, _do_, the why is by-the-by. – Jack Aidley May 06 '22 at 05:03
  • 12
    In Germany windows are double glazed and usually hermetically sealed, more or less. So moisture and CO2 can build up, causing condensation and mildew. Germans like to air inhabited rooms regularly, and this is normally done by opening the window wide, letting the warm, moisture-laden air stream out, then closing it again after a minute. This does not cool the solid objects or the walls, and the air inside will warm up quite quickly again. – RedSonja May 06 '22 at 06:30
  • Seconding RedSonja. *Triple*-glazed windows are not that rare. Measuring heat conductivity of a window is done in W/(m2K), or "U-value"; while traditional single-glazed windows rate about 5.8 W/(m2K), modern windows get values below 1 here. – DevSolar May 06 '22 at 07:11
  • 2
    @André Do the math on how much heat there is in the air. What matters is the heat stored in the room itself (walls, furniture...). That's why it's important to open windows wide for a few minutes - that efficiently ventilates the room while wasting very little energy. It also means the thermostat is largely irrelevant - it doesn't really respond at those timeframes anyway, and most homes with thermostats (in colder parts of Europe) use central heating, so it's not like there's an AC or electric heater that suddenly starts drawing 10 kW or something. – Luaan May 06 '22 at 08:27
  • @RedSonja I would bet a Heat Recovery Ventilator or Energy Recovery Ventilator as Ecnerwal mentions is still a more efficient solution for regular air ventilation. I have an ERV in my own home for the same reasons mentioned. Sealed homes are not unique to Germany. – statueuphemism May 06 '22 at 10:32
  • The need to ventilate *moisture* build-up can also be reduced using a dehumidifier. This won't replace ventilation but can mean it's needed less often or in fewer rooms – Chris H May 06 '22 at 12:15
  • 1
    Something worth noting, just for sharing & conversation, is that usually with modern windows it's going to be the frame and how it's attached to the surrounding wall the creates the most heat loss. Most builders in the US do a poor job ensuring the space been the window and rough-in frame are properly insulated (packing in glass fibers being particularly bad) and then there's usually not a very good airtight seal. Even a cheap vinyl double-pane window will lose more heat at the frame than the glass itself, usually. – pbristow May 08 '22 at 09:22
13

There are a couple of (german-language) websites easily found that explain why this is the best and most efficient place to put your radiator, e.g.

https://heizoel.totalenergies.de/rund-um-heizoel/aktuelles-tipps/heizoel-sparen/wo-ist-der-beste-platz-fuer-die-heizung-040919/

or

https://www.vaillant.de/21-grad/wissen-und-wert/nachgefragt-warum-stehen-heizkoerper-meistens-unter-dem-fenster/

the short summary is:

First, historically, windows were not as well isolated or tightly closed as today, and near the window most heating was needed or you could've not used that corner of the room during the winter

Second, practically, if you put the radiator near the window, you get an airflow pattern like this: enter image description here Now look at the "Fallluft" (falling air) arrows. Imagine that you placed the radiator elsewhere, then the coldest air in the room (from the window, either because it's open or because it loses most heat there) would drop to the ground and flow across the room and your feet would be cold the whole time. Very uncomfortable! While the temperature difference isn't as bad as it was a hundred years ago, you still don't want the cold outside air flowing across the floor. Better have it swept up with the radiator heat and get heated up a bit before it falls down again.

Tom
  • 416
  • 1
  • 6
  • 15
9

This pattern is decades (or maybe a honest century) old and not limited to Germany.

When the central heating started to emerge, energy prices were much, much less of a concern and the modern energy-efficient technologies were yet to develop.

The central heating was neither a way to reduce costs (it did cost more) nor it was aimed to increase the efficiency (it was pretty much the other way round).

Its only goal was to improve the comfort. To a great extent, in fact.

What the heating looked like when you did not have central heating:

  • A single heating appliance in the room, be it wood-powered, coal-powered, oil-powered or electric.
  • The appliance in question had to be away from anything combustible, i.e. away from almost anything.
  • It was uncomfortably hot near the appliance and cold and windy away from it, both because of the convection created by the cold walls and especially windows and because of less than gas-tight doors and windows.
  • Even with rather good doors and windows, the fire still drafted its air from somewhere.

And then, we have a neatly looking modern heat exchangers (also called radiators, even if they didn't work by radiation much). We can put them wherever we want, because the tubing is relatively cheap.

We have new, powerful weapon against the uncomfortable and unhealthy cold convection currents in the room.

Where do these cold currents are worst? That's right, under the windows. Put the radiator there!

Now, you have an order of magnitude less convection in the room, an order of magnitude less temperature gradient and the whole room is usable, including those spaces near the windows.

It was decades later when the energy prices in Europe got to the levels where it is cheaper to pad the walls and install high-quality windows made of special glass allows less heat to escape.

Even in the modern buildings, the windows are still colder than the walls. You can pad the wall with everything you want, but the window has to be transparent, so you are limited to 2 or maybe 3 layers of glass and only the air between them to stop the heat from going outside.

This is why nothing drives the radiators out of their traditional place under the windows (except maybe under the floor where they really belong in 2022).

fraxinus
  • 2,821
  • 5
  • 11
  • 1
    It should be noted that a lot of the expansion of central heating was in places where the heat to power them was cheap and easy to come by - like in waste heat from a local power plant or such. Such combined plants resulted in far better energy efficiency, of course. But you're definitely right that the point was always comfort; as far as I'm concerned, direct heating from a fireplace is so uncomfortable I far prefer just wearing more clothes (of course, unless you just came from a freezing trip, then it's absolutely wonderful - until you properly warm up :P ). – Luaan May 06 '22 at 08:32
  • 4
    @Luaan: [Central heating](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_heating) is called "central" as it relies on one central furnace to heat the house, as opposed to individual ovens / fireplaces in each room. This predates [district heating](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_heating) (which you are referring to here) **by far**, and is far more ubiquitous. – DevSolar May 06 '22 at 08:36
  • @DevSolar My bad, we don't usually distinguish between the two. The only difference is the source of the heat, the rest of the system is identical. Of course, both are very old - district heating was used in Ancient Rome. Using the proper terminology, central heating was very common in disconnected areas, while district heating was much more common in cities and near industries, for obvious reasons. You could regard district heating as a kind of central heating anyway - you just have a central heat exchanger instead of a central furnace. It's just another layer of "central" on top :D – Luaan May 06 '22 at 08:45
  • 2
    @Luaan My point was that virtually every building in Germany has a variation of central heating, regardless of the availability of district heating. Central heating is much more convenient / efficient than individual heating, which went out of fashion when people switched from coal / wood to gas / oil. – DevSolar May 06 '22 at 09:15
  • @DevSolar Absolutely, no argument there. – Luaan May 06 '22 at 09:21
  • 3
    Possibly of use, [many radiators, especially in large buildings, were designed to be used with the windows open](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-08-05/the-curious-history-of-steam-heat-and-pandemics) to allow heating while allowing the flow of fresh air. It's tied to pandemic measures from the Spanish Flu in the early 20th century, and many systems were never adjusted. – Sean Duggan May 06 '22 at 13:32
5

If you open the Window, well.. all the heat immediately flows away by convection.

You are expected to air the room once or twice a day by opening the window wide for up to 20 minutes. At which time you also turn off the radiator, obviously. You should never have the radiator on and the window open, for obvious reasons -- this is regardless of radiator placement.

If you've heated up for some time, the walls will likely be storing some energy and perhaps the convection could be neglected for some time (if you keep the windows open for too long on a cold day, anyway no heating will help). But then the outer walls are probably the coldest in the building, which means that more energy is needed to heat them up in the first place -- also after closing the window.

Having the window the coldest point in the room is desirable. Otherwise moisture will condense on the walls instead of the window pane, leading to mold. This is actually a common problem with older houses getting new windows installed without also improving insulation on the walls. Modern windows are crazy well-insulated.

You want to heat the coldest point to avoid / remove condensation, and have convection transport the moisture away from the coldest point.

The less of a temperature gradient you have, the less heat you need to apply, so don't read this to mean that the window is "a very, very cold place". Ideally it's just a degree colder than the rest, which is easily achieved with modern insulated structures.

Most of the central pipe systems are in the building center (I suspect this is the also the reason why many buildings have "closed" bathrooms, i.e. without windows). For radiators beneath windows, most pipes will need to be extended, resulting in more complex systems which are more expensive and will probably require additional maintenance.

Having all the heading clustered in the center of the building, you will experience a heat gradient from the center to the walls. While perhaps more efficient, this is much less desirable from a comfort standpoint (unequal temperature). You'd also be pumping moisture to the windows to condense and be left there to mold.

All this in addition to what ratchet wrote: The place below the window is otherwise mostly unusable. You need to reach the window so cupboards would be awkward, you don't want to be sitting at the coldest and most humid place furthest away from a radiator placed in the middle of the building.

DevSolar
  • 151
  • 4
  • 1
    "You are expected to air the room once or twice a day by opening the window wide for up to 20 minutes." Who expects this? Is it a legal requirement? Is it some sort of health recommendation? Is this expected to be done 365 days/year, no matter what the outside weather? This is something _I_ have never heard of... – FreeMan May 06 '22 at 11:17
  • 3
    @FreeMan It's a German thing. – Jack Aidley May 06 '22 at 12:24
  • Thanks, Jack. Interesting. I'm sure it does help to get some fresh air into the house daily. It seems that there are more energy efficient ways of doing it, whether heating in the winter or cooling in the summer (American perspective where we almost all have AC for summer use). – FreeMan May 06 '22 at 12:31
  • 3
    @FreeMan: Considering that a well-insulated house tends to aquire all kinds of odors, you might want to let some air in even when it is cold outside. "You are expected" was perhaps poorly worded, but "the way" to let fresh air in is to open the windows wide for a short time, as opposed to crack them open and leave them like that (because, you guessed it, you would be "heating the outside" that way. As for Germany vs. US, you have to realize that Germany is about as far north as southern Canada... – DevSolar May 06 '22 at 15:27
  • 1
    Yes, and Germans drive their Porsches all year 'round while we Americans tend to garage ours when the roads are slippery. We also have fresh air vents, often running through heat exchangers to get fresh air into well sealed houses while minimizing the heat lost. I get that it's a traditional way of doing things there, it's just a different tradition than hear and one I'm not used to. I was learning... – FreeMan May 06 '22 at 16:23
  • 3
    @FreeMan many rental contracts actually have a clause stating you are expected to ventilate the rooms properly (to prevent mildew) and a lot of german online sites (today) or magazines (in older days) have articles about how to properly ventilate (exactly like this, 10-20 minutes wide open, instead of all the day tilted). So maybe "it's expected" is not a good wording, it's more like "this is how everyone in Germany will tell you it should be done". – Tom May 07 '22 at 04:55
  • @DevSolar Southern Canada is further north than a vast majority of the United States, so it is still colder than what most of the US experiences. Canadians also have requirements for Heat Recovery Ventilation / Energy Recovery Ventilation systems, just different traditions and different means of accomplishing the same ventilation. – statueuphemism May 07 '22 at 08:47
  • Interesting, @Tom, thanks for sharing. I had no idea. – FreeMan May 07 '22 at 11:18
  • @statueuphemism Germany being much colder / further north than most of the USA was what I was hinting at. It takes many people from either country by surprise. It also explains many of the differences wirh regards to how houses are built. – DevSolar May 07 '22 at 11:56
  • @DevSolar In another comment to isherwood, you seemed to be saying that the climate is warmer than we think: “Never in the history of recording temperatures have -40°F been measured in Germany. The all-time record is just shy of -35°F (-37°C, 1929). Average temperatures last winter were about 35°F (3°C). 14°F (-10°C) would be notable, -4°F (-20°C) exceptional.” A colder climate makes it even stranger to me that opening windows in the middle of winter is still the preferred method of ventilation where energy efficiency is highly touted. – statueuphemism May 07 '22 at 12:15
  • @DevSolar That said, strange is another word for unfamiliar and I’m sure someone has done an evaluation and considered the tradeoffs. If it were regular practice to open windows in the middle of winter here, I bet we wouldn’t have building regulations to include mechanical ventilation systems in our sealed structures either. – statueuphemism May 07 '22 at 12:22
  • @statueuphemism When you have a mechanical ventilation that heats up the cold outside air (spending energy) before blowing it inside, I do not think that is significantly different from airing once a day, letting cold air in and having it heated up. Your way is much more difficult to install retroactively, though. In the end, same difference. – DevSolar May 07 '22 at 12:33
  • HRV and ERV systems precondition the air passively by transferring heat (and humidity for ERVs) from the exhaust air (that you have already used energy to condition) to the intake air you will be conditioning. This video does a good job of explaining the basic technology: https://youtu.be/i7US4TmyD6k – statueuphemism May 07 '22 at 13:10
  • @statueuphemism I do not think any of this is about improving the answer. Can we just drop the subject, please? It starts to become annoying. – DevSolar May 07 '22 at 13:28
  • 1
    It was supposed to be educational, not annoying. Also, the latitude Germany is at is far from it's only climate factor. I suspect the gulf stream is a big contributor to the fact that it's warmer than Canada. – Andy Mason May 08 '22 at 19:25
4

It leads to a more uniform temperature across the room, which helps saving energy. Having lived in an old, poorly insulated house with a gas oven at the central wall, I can confirm that you get an intense temperature gradient across the room otherwise. Not only between inner and outer walls, but also vertically. Sitting close to the window, I often got cold, but once I stood up I realized the air up there is rather warm. Thus, most of my energy was used heating the roof, while I still had cold feet. In really cold days, humidity would condense on windows and outer walls, eventually leading to a mold problem. As a consequence, I decided to place additional electric heaters at the outer walls.

a_leo
  • 41
  • 1
4

I studied the flow fields induced by convective heating in this exact situation for a university project. In fact it was a situation just like Tom's picture. Indeed I think that heating the air near the window causes the greatest heat transfer, i.e. is least efficient, but avoids the very uncomfortable feelings of a cold draught at your feet by reversing the flow field. I confirmed it by simulating the Navier-Stokes equations with Fourier-type heat transfer laws and a linear (Boussinesq) approximation for buoyancy causing convection. A somewhat long video with different scenarios is available here on YouTube. You really do see (in 2D) how the presence of the heater in this configuration fights the natural convection caused by the window which you see when the heating power is turned off. A heater at the opposite wall would only reinforce the cold-feet airflow field.

If you don't want to watch it then the following pictures give a good idea. The first image shows with the heater on at high power. The second image shows what happens when it is turned off. The small triangles show the direction of the air flow. The left side of the image is the outside (flow direction is opposite because it is being heated.

edit: I would also add that the small ledge over many heaters in Germany will probably reinforce the small circulation loop at the left in Tom's picture, which prevents cold convection currents from directly pouring into the room.

High-Power Heating No Heating

1

Being a plumber all my life who has also studied building and construction, I believe that by reading some of the answers, I find a lot of them have correct elements to them, such as aesthetics, not taking up available wall space, warming the air that is the coldest, etc. But l believe there are two elements that haven’t been addressed.

  1. Although there has been a lot of talk about mildew or mould. Dew or mildew is formed when warm air loses its ability to hold moisture when it cools. Therefore, it deposits moisture when it comes in contact with the cold window. For example, bedroom windows on the south side of a house. (Southern Hemisphere) Pro: no hot sun. Con: lack of light cooler windows and often lack of ventilation. Bathroom windows during and after a shower, steam carrying water cools when it comes into contact with the cold window. When this happens it is called the “dew point”. Without going into any further detail, it is my belief that they are actually fitted off under the window to keep the glass at the same ambient temperature as the surrounding room, therefore preventing the “dew point” occurring inside the room. The dew point would still happen, but it would happen on the outer side of the window preventing water running down the inside of window eventually lifting paint and rotting the sill. The higher the temperature differential between inside and outside, the greater the amount of water deposited.

  2. The other aspect I thought of, which may not be applicable, is it may have something to do with the type of heater. If they are oil-filled, like a lot of the old systems were, then I would imagine there would have to be some form of ventilation for the rising fumes if they had a small undetectable breach. Mind you, this is a guess, and probably not a very good one.

I think #1 is more plausible. Although it has come from my knowledge of material science it is still a guess. Hopefully, a good educated guess.

FreeMan
  • 37,897
  • 15
  • 71
  • 155
  • 1
    Oil filled? I have not heard of that before. All radiators of this type I have seen work with a (closed) water loop. – DevSolar May 07 '22 at 17:13
  • Several other answers have touched on condensation, and the only oil filled radiators I'm familiar with are the plug in electrical type. – FreeMan May 09 '22 at 11:36
0

It might be because there is space near the window. You won't put any furniture in front of the window nor the radiator.

Houští
  • 1
  • 1
  • Yeah, the fact that furniture would rarely be placed in front of the window makes it a better spot for a radiator. – Hot Licks May 07 '22 at 22:11
  • Your answer could be improved with additional supporting information. Please [edit] to add further details, such as citations or documentation, so that others can confirm that your answer is correct. You can find more information on how to write good answers [in the help center](/help/how-to-answer). – Community May 07 '22 at 22:22