4

I'm having a voltage drop that appears and disappears in a 500' underground cable.

The setup: We have a 400 amp service coming into the house from the meter. It goes through a transfer switch for the generator, then two two panels. In one panel is a 100 amp breaker and coming out of that breaker is heavy duty wire (forgot which gauge) that runs about 60' to a j-box. At the j-box that wire is joined to 4/0 wire. (This is all 3 cables plus the ground.) While I don't remember the gauge of the cable from the panel to the j-box (and most of that run is underground), I do remember working out the math with more than one electrician and making sure it could handle the load.

I think it's standard labeling. The common line is marked with white tape, one leg with red tape, and the other is black (no tape).

The 4/0 cables go from the j-box, then underground for about 500', to our barn. There they come up and into the wall and, on the other side of the wall, into the breaker box in the barn. This has worked fine for several years, since we renovated the barn. (It's also passed inspection.) This Saturday we had a late season temperature drop and snow. It was cold, but not as cold as it's been and it didn't stay cold too long. Down below freezing for a few hours Saturday and Sunday night, but in the 40s during the day.

Also, of course, the house is properly grounded. Ground wires run with the 4/0 cable to the barn and connect to the panel ground. Also, the barn itself is properly grounded according to code and that ground connects to the panel and the ground line from the house.

The problem: I went down to the barn on Saturday (the snowy day) and some lights were dim and HVAC was not working. The outlet checker showed some outlets with 97VAC and some with 84VAC, others with 127VAC.

For troubleshooting we (including a licensed electrician friend) removed the cover panels on the electrical panel in the barn and on the panel in the house that feeds the barn. We also turned off the master switch on the barn panel.

At the house, and at the j-box near it, we get 247VAC on the cables from leg to leg. Down in the barn, it reads 237VAC or 214VAC at times. It goes back and forth from 237 to 214 and back. We can't tell yet if it's at regular intervals. There is no temperature correlation. (In other words, it doesn't go down when it gets cold or up when it warms up.) The voltage at the house and nearby j-box remains constant. In the barn, measuring from the black leg to common, we get 127VAC, and that stays constant. From red to common, we get either 112VAC or 90VAC. The total voltage, leg to leg, is always within a volt or two and is the same as the total of measuring both legs separately.

It's possible that one leg has always been a little lower. I remember at the time going over numbers with the electrician when we wired the barn and that the numbers were at least nominal, but one may have been lower than the other. However, the extra 20VAC we lose at times (and get back) is my concern now.

This cable is buried. What could be causing this voltage drop? I've considered moles or groundhogs, but, again, the voltage goes up and down, so something changes at times, at least several times a day.

Possible solution: My electrician and I were talking this over and are worried that something seems to be happening and changing somewhere along 500' of underground cable. That's not easy to find!

We have talked about turning off the power to the underground cables at the house. Then, since it's the red cable that's bad, switching the red and the white cables, both at the house and in the barn. That way the problem cable will become the neutral. Since the neutral is connected to the ground, and the panel is grounded at the barn and connected to the ground from the house, if the problem is a hole in the insulation of the red cable (and, as of now, there's no GFCI on either end - and inspectors were okay with that), then we figure that cable may have a very tenuous connection to the earth ground along the way. Since the neutral connects to the earth ground anyway, it seems like that would be okay.

I'm not an electrician and I have to admit, that's more my idea, from lack of experience, than the electrician's idea. He wants to think it over.

Does that possible solution sound risky or does it make sense?

Are there other thoughts, besides the obvious (digging up cable and testing it!) for a way to deal with this fluctuating voltage drop?

Note: I've already touched on some of this in another question.

Addendum: I forgot to mention that if my solution were to work, I would feel it would still be necessary, as early as I can, to dig another long trench and run replacement cables to the barn. Whatever is happening to the current red cable could get worse or be part of a bigger problem that could hurt the other cables, too. But that's a LOT of work and not something I can do soon or quickly. (We need the barn, both of us work out of it.)

Addendum 2: This is ongoing. I'm getting a LOT of help in chat from one person. I haven't picked an answer yet because I'm learning a lot and, at this point, there are points I've learned that aren't in any of the answers.

Also, a note on conduit, since one answer and some comments have brought that up: This line goes through the woods. Conduit is seriously problematical, since there is a limit of 360° to the number of turns one can have in conduit and 180° of those is used up by the two 90° elbows that are needed to go from the horizontal run to vertical to bring the conduit to the surface. I've talked with building inspectors. (I have a good relationship with the Inspections Department in our county.) Buried line is considered safe and rarely breaks. We've found one break and I'm pretty sure I know the cause of it. It's not animals or rocks. (I was careful to keep rocks and sharp objects out of the way.) It's pretty much impossible to run a straight line through the woods or limit even part of the line to 180° of turns. (And pulling 4/0 through even 180° of turns takes a LOT of strength and means the insulation is going to be rubbing against ALL of corners in the conduit.)

Tango
  • 480
  • 1
  • 6
  • 21
  • 1
    I wouldn't put the failing cable on neutral -- a failed neutral causes the "0" point to shift, and dirt can't compensate for that – ThreePhaseEel Mar 16 '22 at 03:42
  • @ThreePhaseEel: Could you please go into that more for me? – Tango Mar 16 '22 at 03:44
  • Basically, if neutral's gone, the voltages on the two legs then depend on how much load is on each leg, voltage divider style, which means some things get too little voltage and others get too *much*. – ThreePhaseEel Mar 16 '22 at 03:45
  • So if I plug a computer into an outlet, it might get 145 instead of 120? And something else could get 95 instead because it's on the other leg? Any chance you have any suggestions, other than a new 500' trench? – Tango Mar 16 '22 at 03:50
  • Is there something I can use that can take the two legs as input and output two legs and a neutral? – Tango Mar 16 '22 at 03:54
  • Run only 120v to the barn until you replace the cable. – pmont Mar 16 '22 at 04:13
  • @pmont: Can that be done safely by running everything off of just one leg - connecting that leg to both connections in the breaker box? – Tango Mar 16 '22 at 04:16
  • @pmont: That might work for VERY short term, but that'd mean mean no HVAC or sewage tank pump until I can run the new line. One of my businesses uses 3D printing, so that'd be unreliable until I can do something about that. – Tango Mar 16 '22 at 04:32
  • @Tango -- how much power are you actually using? It's possible to use a transformer to regenerate neutral, but we'd need to know your power usage to size it accurately – ThreePhaseEel Mar 16 '22 at 11:37
  • @ThreePhaseEel: Good question! For now, 100 amps in the barn. At some point, we could change that to 200 amps. We have a 400 amp service to split between the house and barn. Eventually, I want to put a pool near the barn. My wife and I are in our late 50s and this is our "dream house" that we've wanted all our lives - for me, that includes a pool at some point. I don't see having two workspaces and a guest house in the barn plus a pool with just 100 amps. I'm VERY interested in the transformer idea! – Tango Mar 16 '22 at 14:47
  • @Tango - Electrically it should be ok to tie both legs to a single 120v phase. Any circuits connected to both legs (expecting 240v) won't work. Shouldn't cause any damage (they'll see 0v), but better to shut them off just in case. Consult with your electrician friend. – pmont Mar 16 '22 at 16:13
  • @pmont: I want to be sure I get what you're saying. What I'm thinking is that we have one good leg, so we could connect both 120V connectors in the breaker box to that one good line and shut off all the breakers for anything that uses 240V. – Tango Mar 16 '22 at 16:49
  • Yes that's right. Switch off any double pole breakers – pmont Mar 16 '22 at 17:48
  • Switching cables briefly as a diagnostic tool is fine. You might even inadvertently fix the problem. Switching them permanently to mask the problem, making it behave in more obscure ways and harder to detect is a terrible idea. Another diagnostic tool is to measure current on all three conductors simultaneously. That will help you determine if there's a ground fault in the red cable or perhaps a kink or some other internal problem that limits its current capacity. Once you know one of the cables has an underground fault you can look for ways to pinpoint it without digging it all up. – jay613 Mar 16 '22 at 20:58
  • If someone happened to have a thermal imaging camera handy it wouldn't hurt to have a look around. Check all of the lugs and breakers looking for hot spots that indicate a high resistance connection. – HABO Mar 17 '22 at 01:37
  • @jay613: I doubt there's just a kink, since the lines have been in place for years at this point. I had to do the 500' trench in sections. The first 250' or so was done in '17. Most of the rest was done in '18 or '19 (can't remember) and the final part was done in late '19 and early '20 when the barn was renovated. I would think a kink would have shown an issue before now. – Tango Mar 17 '22 at 03:02
  • Ok you didn't mention in the OP that the 500' run was done in sections. You have 3 sections with 2 interconnections underground. Those splices are the weak links. Find and fix the problematic splice. – pmont Mar 17 '22 at 15:41
  • @pmont: No, the sections were put down at different times, but no splices underground. Between the house and barn is only ONE j-box, the one I mention on a deck pier. We had to get the house inspected so we could move in and have our wedding in the front yard, so I worked a deal that I could mark off a point about halfway to the barn and dig that and put the cables and 3 black poly pipe conduits in it (for water, sewer, and fiber optic cable) for the final inspection. So I did that and left the coils of conduit and cable above ground until the next spring. (cont'd) – Tango Mar 17 '22 at 16:19
  • (cont'd) The cables (three 4/0 and a ground) were still on the spools and I was careful about handling the black poly pipe for the conduits. Then, in spring, when I could get to it (and after I had reached a point on the creek crossing where I could run the cables over it), I dug the rest of the trench and, for the crossing, put 4" PVC around the cables and conduits. While these sections were done in different ways at different times, there are NO underground joints or splices in the cable. (I did have to do 2 underground joints in the water line due to pipe damage.) – Tango Mar 17 '22 at 16:22
  • @Tango -- if you need to, you can make a horizontal turn by coming up into a handhole then back down again -- gives you a "free" bend in addition to providing a pullpoint – ThreePhaseEel Apr 16 '22 at 02:44
  • @ThreePhaseEel Could you elaborate on that? I think it's close to what I'm doing. I'm using a 90° elbow in a few places to bring the wire up from the trench and into a ground-mounted j-box. What is a handhole? I take it that it's something included in building code? – Tango Apr 17 '22 at 05:21
  • @Tango -- a handhole is a junction box that goes in the ground, with no bottom and a cover on top -- [example from HD, there are lots of others out there at various price points](https://www.homedepot.com/p/10-in-Round-Electrical-Splice-Box-910/202042083) – ThreePhaseEel Apr 17 '22 at 13:39
  • @ThreePhaseEel Okay - not quite what I was doing, but I can see how useful that would be. I wish I had known about that before buying the j-boxes I'm mounting on the surface. I would have used or made one that went down the 18-24" down to the conduit I'm using. – Tango Apr 18 '22 at 03:19

2 Answers2

8

TLDR: Disassemble, clean and reassemble every wire connection on the 4/0 subpanel feeder. Torque the lugs with a torque wrench. Don't take any shortcuts here. Don't "visually inspect and declare to be fine" since it isn't fine. Make sure the splice terminals are aluminum-rated.

Assume that it wasn't properly torqued when done, so re-do everything.

You can do a bunch more measurements and paper troubleshooting if you really want to, but I wouldn't bother.

In the barn, measuring from the black leg to common, we get 127VAC, and that stays constant. From red to common, we get either 112VAC or 90VAC. The total voltage, leg to leg, is always within a volt or two and is the same as the total of measuring both legs separately.

You lost a hot

One of your hot wires is having a bad day. Neutral and the other hot are fine.

It might be an intermittent or partial connection. We know it's not a total loss of connection because that would cause an inversion - the 240V loads would leak phase L2 onto phase L1, causing L1 to be at maybe 90V but in L2's phase. (or 30V between them).

So I think you have a loose connection but not a total break.

Is it somewhere along the cable?

People think that, because the largest area of exposure risk is there. But no - that is vanishingly unlikely, especially for individual wires which per Code must be inside conduit.

Almost always, wire problems are at or near terminations. Since you have been inside the intermediate splice box looking, I would check there first since it it outdoors. Also at the panel and any other splice.

When I say "check a splice" there are methods you can use thermally with a sustained load, but really, the best/safest way is to physically unscrew the splice, remove the wire, examine the condition of wire and splice device, clean up anything that is nasty, add no-Al-ox paste (optional but helpful), reassemble, and torque to the specification. The last bit is often overlooked by DIYers, and science has proven it causes many connection failures on copper wires and aluminum is not immune to the same problems.

Aluminum wire is perfectly fine, and is really the only wise choice for a long run like this. However you must use terminals properly rated for aluminum wire (although almost any terminal designed for 4/0 ought to be, since the vast majority of 4/0 installations are aluminum).

So make sure all that stuff is correct including the torques.

This cable is buried. What could be causing this voltage drop? I've considered moles or groundhogs...

Not likely. Direct burial is under at least 24" of cover. If in plastic conduit, it's at least 18" of cover. That's one enterprising rodent. Thick-wall steel conduit can be 6" cover but no rodent is getting through that.

Neutral and ground are supposed to be isolated at the subpanel

That way the problem cable will become the neutral. Since the neutral is connected to the ground, and the panel is grounded at the barn and connected to the ground from the house, if the problem is a hole in the insulation of the red cable (and, as of now, there's no GFCI on either end - and inspectors were okay with that), then we figure that cable may have a very tenuous connection to the earth ground along the way. Since the neutral connects to the earth ground anyway, it seems like that would be okay.

No. Neutral and ground are totally unrelated systems. They are isolated from each other in all subpanels (if the subpanel was installed correctly) and are only bonded at the main panel. The way they are often bonded is quite confusing and makes people think they're the same thing, but they're not.

Neutral is designed to carry normal return current. Ground is not expected to have any current at all except during a fault condition; the rest of the time its job is to be safe. It can't be safe and carry normal return current; that's why 3-wire feeds to dryers and ranges were banned.

You need the long ground wire to return fault current, to assure you get a breaker trip and don't just float the grounding system at a high voltage. You need the ground rod to arrest lightning and ESD and protect you from natural voltage gradients across the land (e.g. from nearby lightning strikes).

Note that when the hot wire is enlarged for voltage drop reasons, the ground must be too. You enlarged the hot wires from the mandatory #1 for 100A, to #0000, so -4 numerical sizes. The normal ground for 100A is #8 copper so #6 aluminum, so a proportional ground increase is #4Cu or #2Al.

Switching the "dead" wire to neutral would make things much worse. A "lost neutral" is more damaging than a lost hot, because without anything to keep neutral in the middle, both legs will add up to 240V but will vary wildly - one leg being well over 120V.

So if I plug a computer into an outlet, it might get 145 instead of 120? And something else could get 95 instead because it's on the other leg?

Much worse than that. I'd expect numbers like that for a house near other houses, because at the main panel, there's the ground rod/dirt as an alternate path. On a subpanel there is no alternate path, so swings will be extreme.

Transformers

Is there something I can use that can take the two legs as input and output two legs and a neutral?

For now, 100 amps in the barn. At some point, we could change that to 200 amps.

Well, that 4/0 wire for 500' + ??? for 60' is not going to work for 200 amps. Your best bet is a pair of "step-up" transformers. (or to be more precise, your least bad bet). They would need to be 50 KVA, but they can be commodity 240/480V-120/240V transformers which are readily available and occasionally even seen on Craigslist.

At the house you would step up from 240V to 480V. At the barn you would step down from 480V to 120/240V.

This connection only needs 2 conductors, so your lost conductor won't be a problem.

Doing it again? Conduit.

You mentioned individual wires and then have not said a word about conduit. One of the few ways damage can occur "in-line" on a wire is when the ground shifts and settles, and sharp rocks dig into the wires. Of course you do your level best to minimize this, by laying the cable in a bed of several inches of sifted/fine dirt or sand, and covering it with several inches more before backfilling. But it can still happen, e.g. from freeze/thaw or with vehicle traffic.

So if you find yourself digging it up, consider conduit the next time around.

Harper - Reinstate Monica
  • 276,940
  • 24
  • 257
  • 671
  • A few notes. A lot of what you said is close to what I've been thinking. 1-When I first ran the cable, that was in 2017, and I forgot how I did the first branch from the panel to the outdoor j-box. It's 4/0. So it's 4/0 all the way, with that one j-box in the run. 2-It's direct bury cable. Conduits from the panel in the house, under the garage floor (concrete slab) and under the part of the driveway near there. Then no conduit until the one where it goes up above ground for the j-box, then one back down on the other side. – Tango Mar 17 '22 at 05:42
  • 2-(cont'd) The cable crosses the creek on a creek crossing. Since there was a lot of gravel used there, I put it in 4" PVC pipe, along with the 3 conduits (water, fiber for internet, and sewage) that run with the cables. I sliced the 4" pipes in half lengthwise so I could close them around the conduits and cable, then used joiners sliced in half to hold them together and attach them to each other. After the crossing, it's in a regular trench again until it goes into conduit to go up and through the barn wall to the panel. The soil is sandy or red clay and I did watch for sharp objects. – Tango Mar 17 '22 at 05:45
  • 2-(cont'd) It was impossible to run the trench in a straight line for almost the whole distance (other than the creek crossing), so dealing with conduit would have been close to impossible. 3-I agree that usually when something goes wrong, it's at what I call a "critical point." that would be a coupling, splice, area where work has been done, or something like that. Just this afternoon I was FINALLY able to do simultaneous readings of power at the house and the barn. The electrician had done the first readings, but he had limited time. That was the first time I looked in the j-box since 2017. – Tango Mar 17 '22 at 05:49
  • 3-(cont'd) While looking in the j-box, at the couplers used, I realized that we had to touch the probes to the hex bolts and, with the insulation around the lugs, we were NOT able to check the voltage on the cables, but on the lugs. Same in the barn - checking voltage on the hex bolts, and not the cables. While it's possible there's a nick in the cable somewhere, after noticing that, I've been thinking I need to do just what you say. 4-Since the cable runs underground, then when it comes up, it has to go through conduits, and considering the handling at the ends... – Tango Mar 17 '22 at 05:54
  • 4-(cont'd)..., knowing that the cable has to be bent around and moved to fit in the conduit and that insulation might be scraped off by the conduit where it exits the conduit, or I was lining up with your thinking - check the connections first, with a meter, and be sure I'm contacting ONLY the outgoing cable at the house and the incoming cable at the barn. Next, if I'm digging down, I'll check near the house first, then the barn. I figure there is a 98% chance that if it's not a connection, it's within 5' feet of where it goes underground. – Tango Mar 17 '22 at 05:58
  • 4-(cont'd) If it's not near those spots, then it's probably near the creek crossing, since the cable had to sit outdoors for about 9 months before I could finish the trench. There are reasons for that, but they're not important. Basically I did half the trench and buried that half, then left the wire and conduits in coils at that point until I could do the 2nd half. The problem (if it's not at a joint) is finding a good way to seal the cables if I have to take measurements in the trench. – Tango Mar 17 '22 at 06:01
  • Sorry for long notes - but you provide a lot of helpful detail. Some of it includes things I've figured out since my post and other stuff that's new and good suggestions. I'm glad to read you figure it's a joint, since that's about what I'm hoping. (I am NOT looking forward to the idea of digging down to fix this!) Also, this started after temps went up in the 60s (Fahrenheit) for a while, then we had a cold 2 days and snow. It started on the first cold day, with snow. While that could be a coincidence, I think it could be from the temp change and the rain & snow... – Tango Mar 17 '22 at 06:03
  • ...If that's true, and it was the weather that triggered the issue, then it's not underground, since the 2' depth is below the frost line. That's another factor that makes me think it's either above ground or right near where it comes up. Also, knowing that our power company did about what I did - they used direct bury cable for about 700-800' to get to my house. No conduit. That they do this and don't have frequent calls for problems like this tells me that problems with the wire in the trench are infrequent. – Tango Mar 17 '22 at 06:08
  • Sorry for the delay in picking this as an answer. There was a LOT I had to go through to work everything out. (Thanks to @MTA for a lot of help with that - gave him a bonus for that.) The one point I think is worth noting on this is the conduit issue. Sometimes when running cable through woods, you're lucky to get a trencher in there to make a trench through it, but getting conduit to fit in a trench that avoids the trees can be impossible - especially without violating the 360° rule. – Tango May 11 '22 at 02:40
4

I don't see anything in your narrative about simultaneous measurements at the panel in the barn and at the junction box where the 4/0 cable starts near the house. Two people on their phones should measure voltage at the same time at both locations using two voltmeters.

In addition, when the measurement at the panel in the barn indicates a large voltage drop, measure current (amps) on each conductor using a clamp-on ammeter at the junction box near the house. This will help distinguish between a short to ground in the buried cable (high amps) versus a bad connection or a near-break in the cable (no amps).

MTA
  • 8,588
  • 1
  • 13
  • 33
  • Good point about simultaneous measurements! We've measured within a couple minutes (travel time between buildings), but it could have switched in that time. I'm not sure that we can get an ammeter in. I haven't used one in many years and I remember the clamps being fairly thick and there's not much room in there without cutting into the drywall, but it might be possible to do that in the house. The info you have there could be valuable in working things out. I would think, though, since the drop can happen with the barn panel switched off, it's in the line. Thoughts on that? – Tango Mar 16 '22 at 14:50
  • Yes, in the buried line or in the cable run between the house main panel and the junction box that starts the 4/0 run, or in any of the connections along the way. If you can't get a clamp-on ammeter around each cable at the junction box, go all the way back to the main panel in the house. You may also learn something by turning off the 100 amp breaker in the house and the main breaker (or all breakers) in the barn, and measuring resistance in all combinations between the 4 wires. All should read infinity except white to ground should be near zero. Then do the same from the house end. – MTA Mar 16 '22 at 15:58
  • I should also point out that until you take simultaneous voltage measurements at or near the house during a voltage drop at the barn, you really don't know what you're dealing with. For example, your entire 400 amp service could be having intermittent voltage drops on one leg from the utility, but you don't notice at the house because no lighting loads are on that leg. Not likely, but possible in an old house in a rural area. – MTA Mar 16 '22 at 16:09
  • We have 2 heat pumps in the house, requiring 240VAC, plus the stove and a few other things. While it's possible it could be a problem with the lines from the power company, as you point out, it's unlikely, since I haven't seen the HVAC units shut off. (I THOUGHT I saw an issue at one point with something on the same panel as the breaker for barn power and got excited, hoping it was that panel. Apparently it's not.) I have some Raspberry Pis around (always keep extras!) and I'm looking at using them as voltage monitors so they could alert me when the voltage drops. – Tango Mar 16 '22 at 17:25
  • The problem is it's intermittent, so you're right - need to measure both simultaneously. But we have to do it when we know it's low. You have no idea how excited I'd be if I found the issue was a connection, or something near either box. – Tango Mar 16 '22 at 17:26
  • I don't know of any heat pump that would quit working at 214 volts. The same applies to a stove, a dryer, a well pump, etc. Yet a lighting load at 90 volts becomes dim or flickers depending on the type of bulb. So it's entirely possible that it's low voltage on one leg direct from the utility. Time and close monitoring will determine that. – MTA Mar 16 '22 at 18:22
  • Hmmm. Okay, something to think about - but both heat pumps down there stopped working when the power started dropping. With the main switch on the barn breaker off, that pretty much eliminates anything in the barn causing the drop, right? – Tango Mar 16 '22 at 18:51
  • Sorry, impossible to say for sure without more data. – MTA Mar 16 '22 at 20:07
  • Let me know if you're okay taking the SE suggestion of opening a chat room for this. - - We did simultaneous measurements today. First, the voltage on the bad leg has gone down more. The loss was 30V, now it's 40. Second, the voltage at the j-box near the house was full - 247VAC. The good leg had so low a power loss that it's not worth mentioning. The voltage at the barn, at the same time, was around 205VAC. – Tango Mar 16 '22 at 21:18
  • @Tango OK with me. – MTA Mar 16 '22 at 21:45
  • Let us [continue this discussion in chat](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/134833/discussion-between-tango-and-mta). – Tango Mar 16 '22 at 21:48