Questions tagged [point-value]

The chess pieces have been assigned point values to serve as a general guide as to their relative worth.

The standard point values are:

pawn   : 1 point
knight : 3 points
bishop : 3 points
rook   : 5 points
queen  : 9 points

This implies that in general if you trade a knight for a bishop, you don't gain an advantage. You would not want to trade a rook for a bishop, however, since the rook is generally worth more.

Further, it is generally agreed on that two bishops are stronger than 2 knights or 1 knight and 1 bishop.

See the Wikipedia article for different opinions about point values.

Bear in mind, position is everything. That is, there are cases where it's perfectly acceptable to trade a rook for a knight or bishop if the resulting position gives one enough counter-play to make up for the loss of material.

50 questions
44
votes
17 answers

How many points is each chess piece worth?

I am a beginner at chess; please answer this question for me. How many points is each chess piece worth?
Jethik
  • 673
  • 2
  • 6
  • 10
31
votes
10 answers

Why would one promote a pawn to a knight?

I know that it is makes no sense to promote a pawn to a bishop or a rook as the queen can compensate for both but a knight is something different. However, the queen is still much more powerful. So what situations would provoke you into promoting…
MozenRath
  • 805
  • 1
  • 9
  • 16
31
votes
4 answers

Why does Stockfish undervalue pawns when compared to the classical "a piece is worth three pawns" approach?

I was taking a look at values engines give to pawns and piece and was quite shocked by Stockfish values for middlegame (Mg): PawnValueMg = 128 KnightValueMg = 721 ~ 5.6 pawns BishopValueMg = 825 ~ 6.4 pawns RookValueMg = 1276 ~ 9.9…
emdio
  • 2,080
  • 12
  • 22
24
votes
7 answers

How to determine the value of a piece from scratch?

Assume we have a standard chess set setup, but we make a slight change so that (for example) pawns can now move two squares forward on any move rather than just on their initial move. Even assuming that we can still use the established point values…
DTR
  • 3,259
  • 1
  • 17
  • 41
19
votes
11 answers

Why are rooks better than knights?

Generally, rooks are considered to be much better than knights. Why is that? Is it a myth or are they really better? Are there situations where a knights may be better that a rook? I usually think that rooks enter the game a bit later and this…
MozenRath
  • 805
  • 1
  • 9
  • 16
19
votes
2 answers

What is the origin/history of the traditional piece values?

Almost everyone knows the standard rules of thumb: a minor piece is worth three pawns, a rook is worth five pawns, and a queen is worth nine. (I’m aware that this is debated; in particular many theorists think the exchange is worth less than two…
Brennan Vincent
  • 611
  • 5
  • 9
18
votes
3 answers

Does GM Larry Kaufman's "principle of the redundancy of major pieces" truly exists? Or could this effect be caused by the number of Pawns instead?

The following is an extract from The Evaluation of Material Imbalances by GM Larry Kaufman. I put in bold characters everything that was important for this…
Fate
  • 4,786
  • 2
  • 34
  • 68
18
votes
3 answers

How many pawns make up for a missing queen in the endgame?

My partner and I are newbies, and recently found ourselves in this position: FEN 8/8/8/6kp/p5p/8/K/6Q w [FEN "8/8/8/6kp/p5p/8/K/6Q w - - 0 1"] I expected white would easily win because of the queen (and point) imbalance, but white never made time…
ladenedge
  • 283
  • 2
  • 5
15
votes
5 answers

When are pieces worth more (or less) than their nominal value?

Which are the most common situations in which pieces are worth more/less than their value, in point? For example, I know that a protected Knight on 6th rank (3rd for Black) of columns d and e may be worth at least as much as a Rook (thus 5 points).…
javatutorial
  • 2,969
  • 3
  • 21
  • 26
15
votes
5 answers

Why do points matter in trading pieces?

I am a beginner in chess and I am following the tutorials on Chess.com and reading The Complete Idiot's Guide to Chess. In the tutorials about capturing pieces, it is common to count the points in trading pieces. For example, say I can capture a…
Fatih Güven
  • 161
  • 1
  • 5
12
votes
3 answers

Are knights more powerful in Duck Chess?

In the chess variant Duck Chess (full rules), each player moves the shared blocking "duck" piece to any free square on their turn, taking away one or more moves for the opponent. One immediate consequence of this is the failure of "distant defence":…
11
votes
11 answers

Why is the rook worth 5 points while the bishop is only worth 3?

Why is the rook worth 5 points while the bishop is only worth 3? Rooks only move straight, but bishops only move diagonally. Is there something that makes moving straight advantageous to moving diagonally?
clickbait
  • 637
  • 1
  • 6
  • 16
10
votes
5 answers

Relative value of chess pieces on queenside vs kingside

I've read a few variations on the relative value of chess pieces ( Q=9, R=5, N=3, B=3, P=1 ), but I've yet to encounter a variation in value according to the side of the board the piece is on. With regard to rooks, bishops and knights, might there…
James Tomasino
  • 2,265
  • 19
  • 20
9
votes
4 answers

When a game is cut short and the winner is determined by material, do points still count if they're from promoted pawns?

At my school, we play with a time limit, and the winner is decided based on points (for example, a pawn is 1, a rook 5, a knight 3). Let's say my queen is taken by my opponent, scoring 9 points. If I get my pawn to the other end and exchange it for…
Colin Ladd
  • 107
  • 1
  • 3
9
votes
3 answers

Antichess piece value

What is the point value of each chess piece in Antichess? I think they don't need to be negative values, because you're just going after the lower valued ones. In particular, I wonder what the value of a king has in ntichess, since it has no value…
Nate Schultz
  • 155
  • 9
1
2 3 4