The expression refers to aggressive attacking style where one side leaves multiple pieces attacked, but the opponent cannot take full advantage of it since "they can only take one at a time". Was this said by Tal in an interview or in a book (assuming he was actually the one who said it)? Did he say it originally in Russian? If so - what is the exact Russian expression he used?
Asked
Active
Viewed 1,680 times
13
-
1I played a tournament game last week, two days after you asked this, in which I [had 3 minor pieces en prise at once](https://edwardtdean.org/2018/09/30/they-can-only-take-them-one-at-a-time-mikhail-tal/) and I thought about your question during the game. Now I'm even more curious where Tal first said this. I'm tempted to offer a bounty for an answer, but I think that might go to waste right now. – ETD Oct 17 '12 at 21:57
-
@ETD I was curious about your game but the link appears to be broken. – Daniel Alfredo Sottile Sep 24 '18 at 14:46
-
@DanielAlfredoSottile edited. – ETD Sep 30 '18 at 18:06
1 Answers
6
I have seen this referred to/attributed to a couple of Tal's games. It is quite likely that he used the saying more than once. If you study enough of Tal's games, you'll see that he developed a technique of not retracting his (minor) pieces when they were en prise.
The first reference that I was able to find was in his Havana-1966 game against Bjorn Brinck-Claussen. (Quite likely this position, where he's just moved Ra8!
[Title "Tal v Brinck-Claussen, Havana 1966 "]
[fen "R2r2k1/6pp/1p3pn1/3b2q1/3P4/P4QP1/BP3P2/6K1 w - - 0 1"]
The saying is also often attributed to his 1968 game against Chikovani, where Tal plays 19 Bxe6 instead of retracting his dark-squared Bishop.
[Title "Tal v Chikovani, 1968"]
[fen "1qrr2k1/p3bp2/bpn1Bnpp/6B1/3P4/P1N2N2/1PQ2PPP/3RR1K1 w - - 0 1"]
As you can see, in both cases Tal leaves multiple pieces hanging, a psychological strategy that he's used to his advantage.
Hope that helps.
Brian Towers
- 92,895
- 10
- 227
- 372
Ram Narasimhan
- 1,769
- 10
- 16
-
1Incidentally, Tal's move in the second example is incorrect. It gives Tal a big advantage but Black can defend for a long time. The correct move leads to checkmate quickly. – user21820 Dec 31 '19 at 12:18