The Study of Legal Biography
341
order to run the state of Delaware.
simply talk to you without a single
Well, after awhile the doctors began to fall to the rear and the lawyers forged ahead so that-I don't know how it is here — but in other parts of the
note, upon a subject which has been
country there is a general impression
terrified by the sight of the “chiel” in front of me taking notes. Your President has said that I would say something about the value and the interest of the study of legal biography as an aid to legal education, and to that topic I shall confine myself.
that the gentle art of bleeding has passed from the medical to the legal profession. I think it was Lord Stowell who once said, in answer to an objector who gave
vent to some expressions of opposition to public dining for parish or other purposes, “Sir: I believe in public din ing; it brings people together. It causes men to agree who might otherwise dis pute; besides, it lubricates business."Lord Stowell, as we know, was of a convivial disposition, as also was his brother, the famous Lord Chancellor Eldon, and
neither of them was above a bottle of port. We all know that the ability to dine
familiar to my thoughts but which I have never in any way attempted to put into type, although I am somewhat
ingThere it, and are when several I sayways the study of approach of legal biography I do not mean that accidental passing of time which very many of us indulge in, in our otherwise unoccupied
hours at night, by picking up a charm ing volume of legal biography and simply turning the pages to find out when the
once a term, for twelve consecutive
man was born, and what he did, and how he came to the bar, and how, in
terms, in the great Hall of the Middle Temple, was once regarded as an ample proof of the fitness of one to come to the
vated all the bystanders and the juries and astounded them by the extent of
the first month of his practice, he capti
bar, to be called to the bench of the Inn. Mr. Walker, an English barrister whose
his learning and eloquence and how, in
dinners were the most successful in his
to amass, as Thomas Jefferson is said
day and generation, in London, has
to have done, a sum very much larger
the course of three years, he was able
given us a little book on the art of din
than most of us are able to do at the
ing.
end of fifteen or twenty years, as is the manner of ordinary legal biographies, but I mean, gentlemen, something more
With some knowledge of the habits
and the exercises in other state bar associations, it seems to me that you, gentlemen of Rhode Island, have rather
improved upon the practice.
Instead
of having formal essays read at a morn ing session of the State Bar Association,
to be followed by a banquet for the sur vivors some two nights later, you hap pily combine the two functions, and postpone disaster.
My friend Mr. Eaton having thrown
serious and much more scientific and systematic than that. The principle lying at the foundation of any interest in legal biography can be best illustrated by this simple thought. We all know that if we visit the city of Washington and go into the Supreme
Court of the United States and see the nine Justices upon the bench, we ask
and heavy about the discourse, I con
their names, and notice the exact order in which they are arranged to the right and left of the Chief Justice, and, if we are there on a Monday when opinions
cluded that I would come here and
are handed down, we listen intently to
out a caution that if I came here under the idea that I was to read a formal
paper there might be something sodden