In analytical philosophy, both schemas and paradigms are powerful conceptual structures for modeling phenomena, and I wonder which features define and differentiate them.
Schemas (as explored in cognitive science) appear to be sets of expectations. We can create mental representations of phenomena before fully experiencing them, just based on characteristic stimuli (Michalak). We often use schemas to help group and generalize in philosophical thought. So I wonder, are schemas characterized by expectations and predictions?
Paradigms shift. (Kuhn) Paradigms appear to contain conventions and methods (Shuttleworth). Paradigms include grounded theories that survive for a long time as well as the constant emergence of new insights. The most well-known and developed paradigms seem to correspond to fields of practice or scientific study (Levers).
Do the types of phenomena schemas and paradigms model differentiate the two structures? Is it that one is more procedural? Is one personal and the other accepted by a large group? Or something else entirely? How do the philosophical notions of 'schemas' and 'paradigms' differ?
Sources
